Barriers and facilitators to shared decision making in child and youth mental health: clinician perspectives using the Theoretical Domains Framework
- PMID: 30229306
- PMCID: PMC6514112
- DOI: 10.1007/s00787-018-1230-0
Barriers and facilitators to shared decision making in child and youth mental health: clinician perspectives using the Theoretical Domains Framework
Abstract
Shared decision making (SDM) is increasingly being suggested as an integral part of mental health provision. Yet, there is little research on what clinicians believe the barriers and facilitators around practice to be. At the same time, there is also increasing recognition of a theory-practice gap within the field, with calls for more pragmatic uses of theory to inform and improve clinical practice. Using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), a comprehensive, theoretical-led framework, underpinned by 33 behaviour change theories and 128 constructs, clinician perceived barriers and facilitators to SDM are investigated. The sample comprised of 15 clinicians across two sites in England, who took part in qualitative semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Transcripts were analysed using a deductive thematic analysis, and themes were coded under each theoretical domain. Overall, 21 barriers and facilitators for SDM in child and youth mental health were identified across ten domains of the TDF. Under capability, barriers and facilitators were found for knowledge, skills, memory/attention/decision making processes, and behavioural regulation. For opportunity, barriers and facilitators were found for social influences, as well as environmental context and resources. Finally, for motivation, domains covered included: beliefs about consequences, beliefs about capabilities, emotions, and professional role and identity. Findings suggest that a range of barriers and facilitators affect clinicians' abilities to engage in SDM with young people and parents. Interventions which target different domains related to capability, opportunity and motivation should be developed to better facilitate young people and their families in care and treatment decisions.
Keywords: Clinician perspectives; Patient preference; Qualitative research; Shared decision making; Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF).
Conflict of interest statement
No authors have a conflict of interest to declare.
Similar articles
-
Barriers and facilitators to social prescribing in child and youth mental health: perspectives from the frontline.Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 May;33(5):1465-1479. doi: 10.1007/s00787-023-02257-x. Epub 2023 Jul 5. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 37405485 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptions of shared decision making in gastroenterology and inflammatory bowel disease: A qualitative analysis.Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Oct;115:107877. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107877. Epub 2023 Jun 28. Patient Educ Couns. 2023. PMID: 37437510
-
Safewards in acute medical/surgical care wards: Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour model and Theoretical Domains Framework analysis.Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 May;153:104719. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104719. Epub 2024 Feb 13. Int J Nurs Stud. 2024. PMID: 38430663
-
Key influences on university students' physical activity: a systematic review using the Theoretical Domains Framework and the COM-B model of human behaviour.BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 9;24(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17621-4. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38336748 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers and facilitators of pediatric shared decision-making: a systematic review.Implement Sci. 2019 Jan 18;14(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0851-5. Implement Sci. 2019. PMID: 30658670 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Caregiver-child discrepancy in healthcare transition readiness and its associations.Health Care Transit. 2025 Jul 26;3:100113. doi: 10.1016/j.hctj.2025.100113. eCollection 2025. Health Care Transit. 2025. PMID: 40777196 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring motivations and resistances for implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: A systematic review based on a structure-process-outcome model.Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1254-1268. doi: 10.1111/hex.13541. Epub 2022 Jun 5. Health Expect. 2022. PMID: 35662361 Free PMC article.
-
Professionals' and Families' Perspectives on Essential Elements of Shared Decision-Making: A Qualitative Analysis on Families with Multiple and Enduring Problems in Integrated Youth Care.Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025 Jul;52(4):640-652. doi: 10.1007/s10488-025-01443-0. Epub 2025 Apr 30. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025. PMID: 40304925 Free PMC article.
-
What contributes to good outcomes? The perspective of young people on short-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy for depressed adolescents.PLoS One. 2021 Sep 24;16(9):e0257334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257334. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34559829 Free PMC article.
-
When opinions differ: the development of a reflection tool for youth professionals to support shared decision-making with parents.Eur J Soc Work. 2022 Mar 8;26(2):389-400. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2022.2040436. eCollection 2023. Eur J Soc Work. 2022. PMID: 37006454 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Da Silva D. Helping people share decision making. London: The Health Foundation; 2012.
-
- Coulter A, Collins A. Making shared decision making a reality. No decision about me, without me. London: King’s Fund; 2011.
-
- NHS England. Children and young people’s improving access to psychological therapies programme 2016. https://www.england.nhs.uk/mental-health/cyp/iapt/. Accessed 9 Mar 2016
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases
Miscellaneous