Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov;62(6):634-642.
doi: 10.1007/s10384-018-0620-7. Epub 2018 Sep 18.

Three dimensional neuro-retinal rim thickness and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness using high-definition optical coherence tomography for open-angle glaucoma

Affiliations

Three dimensional neuro-retinal rim thickness and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness using high-definition optical coherence tomography for open-angle glaucoma

Suresh Subramaniam et al. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the diagnostic capability of three-dimensional (3D) neuro-retinal rim thickness (NRR) with existing optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) scan parameters using high-definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT).

Design: Retrospective study.

Methods: Based on the mean deviation (MD) of the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA), the 152 subjects were categorized into mild (MD > - 6 dB, 100), moderate (MD - 6 to - 12 dB, 26), and severe (MD < - 12 dB, 26) glaucoma. The HD-OCT values of NRR, RNFL and ganglion cell inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thicknesses, along with those of other parameters (rim area, disc area) were obtained, and the average NRR thickness was calculated.

Results: For all of the HD-OCT parameters, RNFL thickness showed a higher area under the ROC (AUROC) curve (range: 0.937-1.000) than did NRR thickness (range: 0.827-1.000). There were significant RNFL, NRR, and GCIPL AUROC curve differences among the mild, moderate and severe glaucoma groups. RNFL thickness for mild glaucoma showed a significantly larger area than did NRR thickness [area difference: 0.110 (± 0.025); p value < 0.0001). Furthermore, RNFL relative to NRR thickness yielded higher sensitivity (85-100% vs. 72-100%) and specificity (89-100% vs. 84-100%) for diagnosis of glaucoma.

Conclusion: RNFL thickness remains significantly better than 3D NRR thickness in terms of glaucoma-diagnostic capability in HD-OCT.

Keywords: End point of Bruch`s membrane; High-definition optical coherence tomography; Three-dimensional neuro-retinal rim thickness mapping; Unilateral open-angle glaucoma; Vitreo-retinal interface.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. J Glaucoma. 2016 Nov;25(11):873-878 - PubMed
    1. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Jul 1;57(9):OCT404-12 - PubMed
    1. Ophthalmology. 1987 Nov;94(11):1484-7 - PubMed
    1. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Feb;57(2):675-82 - PubMed
    1. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Mar;90(3):262-7 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources