Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2019 Feb;106(3):236-244.
doi: 10.1002/bjs.10985. Epub 2018 Sep 18.

Accuracy of surgical complication rate estimation using ICD-10 codes

Affiliations
Observational Study

Accuracy of surgical complication rate estimation using ICD-10 codes

A Storesund et al. Br J Surg. 2019 Feb.

Abstract

Background: The ICD-10 codes are used globally for comparison of diagnoses and complications, and are an important tool for the development of patient safety, healthcare policies and the health economy. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of verified complication rates in surgical admissions identified by ICD-10 codes and to validate these estimates against complications identified using the established Global Trigger Tool (GTT) methodology.

Methods: This was a prospective observational study of a sample of surgical admissions in two Norwegian hospitals. Complications were identified and classified by two expert GTT teams who reviewed patients' medical records. Three trained reviewers verified ICD-10 codes indicating a complication present on admission or emerging in hospital.

Results: A total of 700 admissions were drawn randomly from 12 966 procedures. Some 519 possible complications were identified in 332 of 700 admissions (47·4 per cent) from ICD-10 codes. Verification of the ICD-10 codes against information from patients' medical records confirmed 298 as in-hospital complications in 141 of 700 admissions (20·1 per cent). Using GTT methodology, 331 complications were found in 212 of 700 admissions (30·3 per cent). Agreement between the two methods reached 83·3 per cent after verification of ICD-10 codes. The odds ratio for identifying complications using the GTT increased from 5·85 (95 per cent c.i. 4·06 to 8·44) to 25·38 (15·41 to 41·79) when ICD-10 complication codes were verified against patients' medical records.

Conclusion: Verified ICD-10 codes strengthen the accuracy of complication rates. Use of non-verified complication codes from administrative systems significantly overestimates in-hospital surgical complication rates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Agreement between methods of identifying admissions with complications versus no complications: a using ICD‐10 codes extracted from administrative data and b using ICD‐10 codes verified from patients' records. GTT, Global Trigger Tool

References

    1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. (eds). To Err is Human. Building a Safer Healthcare System; 1999. http://wps.pearsoneducation.nl/wps/media/objects/13902/14236351/H%2007_T... [accessed 2 January 2018].
    1. Hibbert PD, Molloy CJ, Hooper TD, Wiles LK, Runciman WB, Lachman P et al The application of the Global Trigger Tool: a systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care 2016; 28: 640–649. - PubMed
    1. Gawande AA, Thomas EJ, Zinner MJ, Brennan TA. The incidence and nature of surgical adverse events in Colorado and Utah in 1992. Surgery 1999; 126: 66–75. - PubMed
    1. Zegers M, de Bruijne MC, de Keizer B, Merten H, Groenewegen PP, van der Wal G et al The incidence, root‐causes, and outcomes of adverse events in surgical units: implication for potential prevention strategies. Patient Saf Surg 2011; 5: 13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Vries EN, Ramrattan MA, Smorenburg SM, Gouma DJ, Boermeester MA. The incidence and nature of in‐hospital adverse events: a systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care 2008; 17: 216–223. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types