Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan;25(1):119-127.
doi: 10.1002/lt.25340.

Expansion of the Liver Donor Supply Through Greater Use of Split-Liver Transplantation: Identifying Optimal Recipients

Affiliations

Expansion of the Liver Donor Supply Through Greater Use of Split-Liver Transplantation: Identifying Optimal Recipients

Douglas B Mogul et al. Liver Transpl. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

The increased use of split-liver transplantation (SLT) represents a strategy to increase the supply of organs. Although outcomes after SLT and whole liver transplantation (WLT) are similar on average among pediatric recipients, we hypothesized that the relationship between graft type and outcomes may vary depending on patient, donor, and surgical characteristics. We evaluated graft survival among pediatric (<18 years) deceased donor, liver-only transplant recipients from March 2002 until December 2015 using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Graft survival was assessed in a Cox proportional hazards model, with and without effect modification between graft type and donor, recipient, and surgical characteristics, to identify conditions where the risk of graft loss for SLT and WLT were similar. In a traditional multivariable model, characteristics associated with graft loss included donor age >50 years, recipient weight <10 kg, acute hepatic necrosis, autoimmune diseases, tumor, public insurance, and cold ischemia time (CIT) >8 hours. In an analysis that explored whether these characteristics modified the relationship between graft type and graft loss, many characteristics associated with loss actually had similar outcomes regardless of graft type, including weight <10 kg, acute hepatic necrosis, autoimmune diseases, and tumor. In contrast, several subgroups had worse outcomes when SLT was used, including recipient weight 10-35 kg, non-biliary atresia cholestasis, and metabolic disease. Allocation score, share type, or CIT did not modify risk of graft type and graft failure. Although one might anticipate that individuals with higher rates of graft loss would be worse candidates for SLT, data suggest that these patients actually have similar rates of graft loss. These findings can guide surgical decision making and may support policy changes that promote the increased use of SLT for specific pediatric recipients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND DISCLOSURES

Dorry Segev has financial relationships from Novartis and Sanofi. Kathy Schwarz has financial relationships with Gilead, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Roche, and Up to Date. There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure:
Figure:
Forest plot of adjusted hazard ratios for relative risk of graft failure in individuals receiving a split liver transplant vs whole liver transplant based on specific donor, recipient and surgical characteristics.

References

    1. Kim WR, Lake JR, Smith JM, Skeans MA, Schladt DP, Edwards EB, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2015 Annual Data Report: Liver. Am J Transplant. 2017;17 Suppl 1:174–251. - PubMed
    1. Hsu EK, Shaffer ML, Gao L, Sonnenday C, Volk ML, Bucuvalas J, et al. Analysis of Liver Offers to Pediatric Candidates on the Transplant Wait List. Gastroenterology. 2017. October;153(4):988–95. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hsu EK, Mazariegos GV. Global lessons in graft type and pediatric liver allocation: A path toward improving outcomes and eliminating wait-list mortality. Liver Transplant. 2017. January;23(1):86–95. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mogul DB, Luo X, Bowring MG, Chow EK, Massie AB, Schwarz KB, et al. Fifteen-Year Trends in Pediatric Liver Transplants: Split, Whole Deceased, and Living Donor Grafts. J Pediatr. 2018. May;196:148–153.e2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cauley RP, Vakili K, Fullington N, Potanos K, Graham DA, Finkelstein JA, et al. Deceased-donor split-liver transplantation in adult recipients: is the learning curve over? J Am Coll Surg. 2013. October;217(4):672–684.e1. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms