Phase I Study of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy and Image-Guided Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer
- PMID: 30231543
- PMCID: PMC6162662
- DOI: 10.3390/cancers10090338
Phase I Study of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy and Image-Guided Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer
Abstract
A phase I study was performed to determine the recommended dose of carbon ion radiotherapy and 3D image-guided brachytherapy for histologically confirmed stage II (≥4 cm), III, or IVA cervical cancer. Dose-limiting toxicities (treatment-related toxicities occurring within three months from the start of carbon ion radiotherapy) included Grade 3 non-hematological toxicity, Grade 4 hematological toxicity, or interruption of treatment for more than two weeks due to treatment-related toxicities. Carbon ion radiotherapy consisted of whole-pelvic irradiation with 36.0 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 12 fractions and local boost with 19.2 Gy in four fractions for the primary site, and for positive lymph nodes. Three sessions of three-dimensional (3D) image-guided brachytherapy were administered after completion of carbon ion radiotherapy. Weekly cisplatin at a dose of 40 mg/m² was given concurrently. At a dose level of one, a total rectosigmoid D2cc dose between 67.2 Gy and 71.3 Gy at a biological equivalent dose of 2 Gy per fraction from carbon ion radiotherapy and 3D image-guided brachytherapy was prescribed. Six patients were enrolled into this dose level. No patients developed the pre-defined dose-limiting toxicities. For late toxicities, however, one patient developed Grade 3 rectal hemorrhage requiring transfusion at 10 months after treatment. The median survival time was 50.0 months for the five surviving patients. No further dose escalation was performed, and we determined the dose of level one as the recommended rectosigmoid dose. Although our results are preliminary, the study regimen encourages further investigation (registration: UMIN000013340).
Keywords: carbon ion radiotherapy; cervical cancer; concurrent chemoradiotherapy; image-guided brachytherapy; phase I study.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Haie-Meder C., Pötter R., Van Limbergen E., Barillot I., De Brabandere M., Dimopoulos J., Dumas I., Erickson B., Lang S., Nulens A., et al. Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (I): Concepts and terms in 3D image-based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV. Radiother. Oncol. 2005;74:235–245. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2004.12.015. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Pötter R., Haie-Meder C., Van Limbergen E., Barillot I., De Brabandere M., Dimopoulos J., Dumas I., Erickson B., Lang S., Nulens A., et al. Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (II): Concepts and terms in 3D image-based treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy–3D dose volume parameters and aspects of 3D image-based anatomy, radiation physics, and radiobiology. Radiother. Oncol. 2006;78:67–77. - PubMed
-
- Pötter R., Georg P., Dimopoulos J.C., Grimm M., Berger D., Nesvacil N., Georg D., Schmid M.P., Reinthaller A., Sturdza A., et al. Clinical outcome of protocol based image (MRI) guided adaptive brachytherapy combined with 3D conformal radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Radiother. Oncol. 2011;100:116–123. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.07.012. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Rijkmans E.C., Nout R.A., Rutten I.H., Ketelaars M., Neelis K.J., Laman M.S., Coen V.L., Gaarenstroom K.N., Kroep J.R., Creutzberg C.L. Improved survival of patients with cervical cancer treated with image-guided brachytherapy compared with conventional brachytherapy. Gynecol. Oncol. 2014;135:231–238. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.08.027. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ohno T., Noda S.E., Okonogi N., Murata K., Shibuya K., Kiyohara H., Tamaki T., Ando K., Oike T., Ohkubo Y., et al. In-room computed tomography-based brachytherapy for uterine cervical cancer: Results of a 5-year retrospective study. J. Radiat. Res. 2017;58:543–551. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrw121. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
