Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul-Sep;16(3):1474704918800062.
doi: 10.1177/1474704918800062.

Life History, Fertility, and Short-Term Mating Motivation

Aekyoung Kim  1 , Hannah Bradshaw  2 , Kristina M Durante  3 , Sarah E Hill  2
Affiliations

Life History, Fertility, and Short-Term Mating Motivation

Aekyoung Kim et al. Evol Psychol. 2018 Jul-Sep.

Abstract

The current research examines the impact of women's early-life socioeconomic status (SES; used as a proxy measure of life history strategy), relationship status, and ovulatory cycle phase on their desire for short-term mating. Results revealed that during the periovulatory phase (i.e., the high-fertility phase of the monthly ovulatory cycle), single women from low SES environments expressed an increased desire for short-term mating, whereas the opposite was found for single women from high SES environments. No such pattern was found for partnered women. These results suggest that one's early-life environment and relationship status may play a key role in how women respond to internal fertility cues, providing important new insights into factors that may moderate ovulatory shifts in mating behavior. Results provide some of the first evidence that one's developmental history may alter the expression of ovulatory cycle adaptations.

Keywords: life history theory; mating; ovulation; relationship status; short-term mating.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Likelihood of engaging in a one-night stand as a function of fertility, childhood socioeconomic status, and relationship status (Study 1).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Likelihood of engaging in a one-night stand (high minus low fertility) as a function of childhood socioeconomic status and relationship status (Study 2).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adler N. E., Boyce T., Chesney M. A., Cohen S., Folkman S., Kahn R. L., Syme S. L. (1994). Socioeconomic status and health: The challenge of the gradient. American Psychologist, 49, 15. - PubMed
    1. Anderson U. S., Perea E. F., Becker D. V., Ackerman J. M., Shapiro J. R., Neuberg S. L., Kenrick D. T. (2010). I only have eyes for you: Ovulation redirects attention (but not memory) to attractive men. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 804–808. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ayoola A. B., Zandee G. L., Johnson E., Pennings K. (2014). Contraceptive use among low-income women living in medically underserved neighborhoods. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 43, 455–464. - PubMed
    1. Belsky J., Houts R. M., Fearon R. P. (2010). Infant attachment security and the timing of puberty: Testing an evolutionary hypothesis. Psychological Science, 21, 1195–1201. - PubMed
    1. Belsky J., Steinberg L., Draper P. (1991). Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Development, 62, 647–670. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources