Evaluation of Risk Factors for Clostridium difficile Infection Based on Immunochromatography Testing and Toxigenic Culture Assay
- PMID: 30232129
- PMCID: PMC6258861
- DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00555-18
Evaluation of Risk Factors for Clostridium difficile Infection Based on Immunochromatography Testing and Toxigenic Culture Assay
Abstract
In recent years, the diagnostic method of choice for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a rapid enzyme immunoassay in which glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) antigen and C. difficile toxin can be detected (C. diff Quik Chek Complete; Alere Inc.) (Quik Chek). However, the clinical significance remains unclear in cases that demonstrate a positive result for GDH antigen and are negative for toxin. In this study, we used the Quik Chek test kit on fecal samples, with an additional toxin detection step using a toxigenic culture assay for the aforementioned cases. CDI risk factors were assessed among the 3 groups divided by the Quik Chek test results. The study involved 1,565 fecal samples from patients suspected to have CDI who were hospitalized during the period of April 2012 to March 2014. The 3 groups were defined as follows: both GDH antigen positive and toxin positive (by Quik Chek test) (toxin-positive [TP] group, n = 109), both GDH antigen and toxin negative (toxin-negative [TN] group, n = 111), and positive only for GDH antigen but toxin positive with subsequent toxigenic culture (toxigenic culture [TC] group, n = 72). The gender, age, number of hospitalization days, white blood cell (WBC) counts, serum albumin levels, body mass index (BMI), fecal consistency, and use of antibacterials and proton pump inhibiters (PPIs) were analyzed. The positive rate for the fecal direct Quik Chek test was 7.0% (109/1,565 cases). However, toxigenic culture assays using the Quik Chek test for only the GDH-antigen-positive/toxin-negative samples were 35.3% positive (72/204 cases). As a result, the true positive rate for C. difficile toxin detection was estimated to be 11.6% (181/1,565 cases). Moreover, significant differences (P < 0.05) in the number of hospitalization days (>50 days), WBC counts (>10,000 WBCs/μl), and use of PPIs comparing the TN, TP, and TC groups, were observed. The odds ratios (ORs) for the development of CDI were 1.61 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94 to 2.74) and 2.98 (95% CI, 1.59 to 5.58) for numbers of hospitalization days, 2.16 (95% CI, 1.24 to 3.75) and 2.24 (95% CI, 1.21 to 4.14) for WBC counts, and 9.03 (95% CI, 4.9 to 16.6) and 9.15 (95% CI, 4.59 to 18.2) for use of PPIs in the TP and TC groups, respectively. These findings demonstrated that the use of PPIs was a significant risk factor for CDI development. Moreover, antibacterials such as carbapenems, cephalosporins, and fluoroquinolones were demonstrated to be risk factors. In conclusion, identification of the TC group of patients is thought to be important, as this study demonstrates that this group bears the same high risk of developing CDI as the TP group.
Keywords: C. diff Quik Chek Complete test; Clostridium difficile infection; glutamate dehydrogenase; risk factor; toxigenic culture assay.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Evaluation of antigen-positive toxin-negative enzyme immunoassay results for the diagnosis of toxigenic Clostridium difficile infection.J Med Invest. 2018;65(1.2):131-135. doi: 10.2152/jmi.65.131. J Med Invest. 2018. PMID: 29593183
-
Impact of simultaneous glutamate dehydrogenase and toxin A/B rapid immunoassay on Clostridium difficile diagnosis and treatment in hospitalized patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhea in a university hospital of Brazil.J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Feb;33(2):393-396. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13901. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018. PMID: 28730697
-
Simultaneous Detection of Clostridioides difficile Glutamate Dehydrogenase and Toxin A/B: Comparison of the C. DIFF QUIK CHEK COMPLETE and RIDASCREEN Assays.Ann Lab Med. 2019 Mar;39(2):214-217. doi: 10.3343/alm.2019.39.2.214. Ann Lab Med. 2019. PMID: 30430786 Free PMC article.
-
The role of glutamate dehydrogenase for the detection of Clostridium difficile in faecal samples: a meta-analysis.J Hosp Infect. 2011 Jan;77(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.07.024. Epub 2010 Dec 8. J Hosp Infect. 2011. PMID: 21145132 Review.
-
Clostridium difficile testing algorithms: what is practical and feasible?Anaerobe. 2009 Dec;15(6):270-3. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2009.10.005. Epub 2009 Oct 22. Anaerobe. 2009. PMID: 19853666 Review.
Cited by
-
Assessment of LAMPAuris for Rapid Detection of Candida auris in Clinical Specimens.Mycopathologia. 2024 Sep 23;189(5):87. doi: 10.1007/s11046-024-00892-9. Mycopathologia. 2024. PMID: 39312077
-
Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification for the Diagnosis of Sporotrichosis by Sporothrix brasiliensis.Mycopathologia. 2024 Aug 3;189(5):73. doi: 10.1007/s11046-024-00880-z. Mycopathologia. 2024. PMID: 39096410
-
Is primary prevention of Clostridioides difficile infection possible with combination probiotics in elderly orthopedic patients?Biosci Microbiota Food Health. 2019;38(3):73-74. doi: 10.12938/bmfh.19-001. Epub 2019 Apr 5. Biosci Microbiota Food Health. 2019. PMID: 31384517 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Clostridium difficile in patients with nosocomial diarrhea, Northwest of Iran.Health Promot Perspect. 2020 Mar 30;10(2):148-151. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2020.24. eCollection 2020. Health Promot Perspect. 2020. PMID: 32296628 Free PMC article.
-
Clostridioides difficile-Associated Diarrhea: Infection Prevention Unknowns and Evolving Risk Reduction Strategies.Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2019 Jan 23;21(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s11908-019-0659-8. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2019. PMID: 30673882 Review.
References
-
- Kato H, Kita H, Karasawa T, Maegawa T, Koino Y, Takakuwa H, Saikai T, Kobayashi K, Yamagishi T, Nakamura S. 2001. Colonisation and transmission of Clostridium difficile in healthy individuals examined by PCR ribotyping and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J Med Microbiol 50:720–727. doi:10.1099/0022-1317-50-8-720. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Matsuki S, Ozaki E, Shozu M, Inoue M, Shimizu S, Yamaguchi N, Karasawa T, Yamagishi T, Nakamura S. 2005. Colonization by Clostridium difficile of neonates in a hospital, and infants and children in three day-care facilities of Kanazawa, Japan. Int Microbiol 8:43–48. - PubMed
-
- Cohen SH, Gerding DN, Johnson S, Kelly CP, Loo VG, McDonald LC, Pepin J, Wilcox MH. 2010. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 31:431–455. doi:10.1086/651706. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous