Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Sep 5:11:353-369.
doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S120584. eCollection 2018.

Interpersonal psychotherapy for eating disorders: current perspectives

Affiliations
Review

Interpersonal psychotherapy for eating disorders: current perspectives

Mario Miniati et al. Psychol Res Behav Manag. .

Abstract

Background: Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) is a time-limited and affect-, life-event-, and present-focused psychotherapy originally conceptualized for unipolar depression, and then adapted to the treatment of other disorders, including eating disorders (EDs). The purpose of this paper is to conduct a systematic review of studies on IPT for EDs.

Methods: The authors performed literature searches, study selection, method, and quality evaluation independently. Data were summarized using a narrative approach.

Results: Of the 534 papers retrieved, 37 studies met the inclusion criteria, and 15 were considered for the systematic review (randomized controlled trials and long-term follow-up studies derived from the randomized controlled trials). Their analysis revealed six main findings: 1) no significant differences between IPT and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) were found when administered as monotherapy to patients with anorexia nervosa; 2) when administered as monotherapy to patients with bulimia nervosa (BN), IPT had lower outcomes than CBT and its enhanced version; 3) patients with BN who remitted with IPT showed a prolonged time spent in clinical remission, when followed up on the long term; 4) IPT and CBT, with different timings and methods, have both shown efficacy in the mid-term/long-term period in patients with BN; 5) CBT and its enhanced version produced rapid changes in the acute phase. IPT led to improvements occurring later, with slower changes that tended to maintain efficacy in the long term; 6) abstinence from binge eating with group IPT for binge eating disorder is stable and maintained (or further improved) in the long term.

Conclusion: IPT is a reasonable, cost-effective alternative to CBT for the overall ED spectrum.

Keywords: anorexia nervosa; binge-eating disorder; bulimia nervosa; eating spectrum; interpersonal psychotherapy; treatment efficacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram of selection studies. Abbreviation: PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fairburn CG, Cooper Z, Waller D. “Complex cases” and comorbidity. In: Fairburn CG, editor. Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Eating Disorders. New York: Guilford Press; 2008. pp. 245–258.
    1. Treasure J, Claudino AM, Zucker N, Disorders E. Eating disorders. Lancet. 2010;375(9714):583–593. - PubMed
    1. Hjern A, Lindberg L, Lindblad F. Outcome and prognostic factors for adolescent female in-patients with anorexia nervosa: 9- to 14-year follow-up. Br J Psychiatry. 2006;189:428–432. - PubMed
    1. Wilfley D, Stein R, Welch R. Interpersonal psychotherapy. In: Treasure J, Schmidt U, van Furth E, editors. Handbook of Eating Disorders. 2nd ed. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2003. pp. 253–270.
    1. Sullivan HS. The Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry. New York: Norton; 1953.

LinkOut - more resources