Interpersonal psychotherapy for eating disorders: current perspectives
- PMID: 30233263
- PMCID: PMC6130260
- DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S120584
Interpersonal psychotherapy for eating disorders: current perspectives
Abstract
Background: Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) is a time-limited and affect-, life-event-, and present-focused psychotherapy originally conceptualized for unipolar depression, and then adapted to the treatment of other disorders, including eating disorders (EDs). The purpose of this paper is to conduct a systematic review of studies on IPT for EDs.
Methods: The authors performed literature searches, study selection, method, and quality evaluation independently. Data were summarized using a narrative approach.
Results: Of the 534 papers retrieved, 37 studies met the inclusion criteria, and 15 were considered for the systematic review (randomized controlled trials and long-term follow-up studies derived from the randomized controlled trials). Their analysis revealed six main findings: 1) no significant differences between IPT and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) were found when administered as monotherapy to patients with anorexia nervosa; 2) when administered as monotherapy to patients with bulimia nervosa (BN), IPT had lower outcomes than CBT and its enhanced version; 3) patients with BN who remitted with IPT showed a prolonged time spent in clinical remission, when followed up on the long term; 4) IPT and CBT, with different timings and methods, have both shown efficacy in the mid-term/long-term period in patients with BN; 5) CBT and its enhanced version produced rapid changes in the acute phase. IPT led to improvements occurring later, with slower changes that tended to maintain efficacy in the long term; 6) abstinence from binge eating with group IPT for binge eating disorder is stable and maintained (or further improved) in the long term.
Conclusion: IPT is a reasonable, cost-effective alternative to CBT for the overall ED spectrum.
Keywords: anorexia nervosa; binge-eating disorder; bulimia nervosa; eating spectrum; interpersonal psychotherapy; treatment efficacy.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Figures
References
-
- Fairburn CG, Cooper Z, Waller D. “Complex cases” and comorbidity. In: Fairburn CG, editor. Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Eating Disorders. New York: Guilford Press; 2008. pp. 245–258.
-
- Treasure J, Claudino AM, Zucker N, Disorders E. Eating disorders. Lancet. 2010;375(9714):583–593. - PubMed
-
- Hjern A, Lindberg L, Lindblad F. Outcome and prognostic factors for adolescent female in-patients with anorexia nervosa: 9- to 14-year follow-up. Br J Psychiatry. 2006;189:428–432. - PubMed
-
- Wilfley D, Stein R, Welch R. Interpersonal psychotherapy. In: Treasure J, Schmidt U, van Furth E, editors. Handbook of Eating Disorders. 2nd ed. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2003. pp. 253–270.
-
- Sullivan HS. The Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry. New York: Norton; 1953.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
