The Contribution of Attention to the Mere Exposure Effect for Parts of Advertising Images
- PMID: 30233470
- PMCID: PMC6134073
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01635
The Contribution of Attention to the Mere Exposure Effect for Parts of Advertising Images
Abstract
Repeatedly presented stimuli are affectively evaluated more positively than novel stimuli. This phenomenon, known as the mere exposure effect, is used in advertising. However, it is still unclear in which part of advertising images the mere exposure effect occurs. Given the recent suggestion that attention plays an important role in the mere exposure effect, it is possible that the mere exposure effect does not occur for commercial products when advertising images consist of a commercial product along with an attractive human model. To investigate this possibility, we manipulated the relationship between advertising images repeatedly presented in an exposure phase and images presented in a later rating phase. In the exposure phase, participants were repeatedly presented with advertising images consisting of a cosmetic product along with an attractive female model and were instructed to attend to a specified part of the image (Experiment 4) or were given no such an instruction (Experiments 1, 2, and 3). In the rating phase, participants were asked to evaluate their preference for complete advertising images (Experiment 1), the images of female models (Experiment 2), or images of products (Experiments 3 and 4) that were previously presented or not presented. The mere exposure effect was found for whole advertising images and images of female models. On the other hand, the mere exposure effect for the images of products was seen only when participants were explicitly encouraged to direct their attention to the product parts of the advertising image. That is, the results of this study suggest that the mere exposure effect does not always occur for every part of the repeated advertising images, and that attention would modulate the mere exposure effect for advertising images.
Keywords: advertising; attention; face; mere exposure effect; preference.
Figures


Similar articles
-
The mere exposure effect for visual image.Mem Cognit. 2018 Feb;46(2):181-190. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0756-6. Mem Cognit. 2018. PMID: 28856624
-
The Mere Exposure Instruction Effect.Exp Psychol. 2017 Sep;64(5):299-314. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000376. Exp Psychol. 2017. PMID: 29173140
-
Stimulus Threat and Exposure Context Modulate the Effect of Mere Exposure on Approach Behaviors.Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 29;7:1881. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01881. eCollection 2016. Front Psychol. 2016. PMID: 27965614 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding advertising in pet nutrition.Can Vet J. 1994 Apr;35(4):246-50. Can Vet J. 1994. PMID: 8076285 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A re-examination of the mere exposure effect: The influence of repeated exposure on recognition, familiarity, and liking.Psychol Bull. 2017 May;143(5):459-498. doi: 10.1037/bul0000085. Epub 2017 Mar 6. Psychol Bull. 2017. PMID: 28263645 Review.
Cited by
-
The "multiple exposure effect" (MEE): How multiple exposures to similarly biased online content can cause increasingly larger shifts in opinions and voting preferences.PLoS One. 2025 May 12;20(5):e0322900. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322900. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40354464 Free PMC article.
-
The Welleye: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding and Promoting Wellbeing.Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 29;12:716572. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.716572. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 34777096 Free PMC article.
-
The Multiple Platforms Effect (MPE): A quantification of how exposure to similarly biased content on multiple online platforms might impact users.PLoS One. 2025 Aug 1;20(8):e0327209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327209. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40748996 Free PMC article.
-
How perceived eWOM in visual form influences online purchase intention on social media: A research based on the SOR theory.PLoS One. 2025 Jul 10;20(7):e0328093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328093. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40638693 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bell R., Buchner A. (2018). Positive effects of disruptive advertising on consumer preferences. J. Interact. Mark. 41 1–13. 10.1016/j.intmar.2017.09.002 - DOI
-
- Bornstein R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. Psychol. Bull. 106 265–289. 10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265 - DOI
-
- Bornstein R. F., Kale A. R., Cornell K. R. (1990). Boredom as a limiting condition on the mere exposure effect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 58 791–800. 10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.791 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources