Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Apr 1;44(7):E393-E399.
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002868.

Biomechanical Comparison of C1 Lateral Mass-C2 Short Pedicle Screw-C3 Lateral Mass Screw-Rod Construct Versus Goel-Harms Fixation for Atlantoaxial Instability

Young Lu  1 , Yu-Po Lee  1 , Nitin N Bhatia  1 , Thay Q Lee  2
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Biomechanical Comparison of C1 Lateral Mass-C2 Short Pedicle Screw-C3 Lateral Mass Screw-Rod Construct Versus Goel-Harms Fixation for Atlantoaxial Instability

Young Lu et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). .

Abstract

Study design: A biomechanical in vitro study using human cadaveric spines.

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare atlantoaxial stability and stiffness of a C1 lateral mass - C2 short pedicle - C3 lateral mass screw-rod construct versus C1 lateral mass - C2 pedicle screw-rod construct.

Summary of background data: The C1 lateral mass - C2 pedicle screw-rod construct provides excellent atlantoaxial fixation, but C2 pedicle screw placement is associated with risk of vertebral artery injury. The use of shorter C2 pedicle screws may mitigate the risk of vascular injury but may result in reduced C1-C2 stabilization. Extending C1 lateral mass - C2 short pedicle screw-rod construct with C3 lateral mass screws may mitigate the risk of vascular injury without compromising C1-C2 fixation.

Methods: Seven cervical spines were tested with internal control experimental design in the following sequence: intact state, and following creation of type II odontoid fracture, the specimen was instrumented with C1 lateral mass - C2 pedicle screw fixation (C2PED), C1 lateral mass - C2 short pedicle screw fixation (C2SPED), and C1 lateral mass - C2 short pedicle - C3 lateral mass screw fixation (C2SPED-C3LM). For each condition, the angular stiffness and range of motion (ROM) with 1.5-Nm load in flexion/extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and right/left axial rotation (RAR/LAR) were quantified.

Results: Instrumented conditions demonstrated significantly lower C1-C2 angular ROM and greater stiffness than the intact state. Compared with C2PED, C2SPED-C3LM demonstrated significantly lower C1-C2 ROM during FE and LB, significantly greater C1-C2 stiffness in flexion and right/left LB, similar C1-C2 ROM and stiffness in RAR/LAR, and similar stiffness in extension. C2SPED-C3LM demonstrated significantly greater atlantoaxial stabilization in the sagittal and coronal planes than C2PED construct.

Conclusion: Compared with C2PED, C2SPED-C3LM may be a suitable alternative surgical strategy for atlantoaxial instability that provides superior atlantoaxial fixation.

Level of evidence: N/A.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Huang DG, Hao DJ, He BR, et al. Posterior atlantoaxial fixation: a review of all techniques. Spine J 2015; 15:2271–2281.
    1. Jeanneret B, Magerl F. Primary posterior fusion C1/2 in odontoid fractures: indications, technique, and results of transarticular screw fixation. J Spinal Disord 1992; 5:464–475.
    1. Abou Madawi A, Solanki G, Casey AT, et al. Variation of the groove in the axis vertebra for the vertebral artery. Implications for instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997; 79:820–823.
    1. Harms J, Melcher RP. Posterior C1-C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001; 26:2467–2471.
    1. Ludwig SC, Kramer DL, Balderston RA, et al. Placement of pedicle screws in the human cadaveric cervical spine: comparative accuracy of three techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25:1655–1667.

Publication types