The Ethics of Smart Pills and Self-Acting Devices: Autonomy, Truth-Telling, and Trust at the Dawn of Digital Medicine
- PMID: 30235091
- DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1498933
The Ethics of Smart Pills and Self-Acting Devices: Autonomy, Truth-Telling, and Trust at the Dawn of Digital Medicine
Abstract
Digital medicine is a medical treatment that combines technology with drug delivery. The promises of this combination are continuous and remote monitoring, better disease management, self-tracking, self-management of diseases, and improved treatment adherence. These devices pose ethical challenges for patients, providers, and the social practice of medicine. For patients, having both informed consent and a user agreement raises questions of understanding for autonomy and informed consent, therapeutic misconception, external influences on decision making, confidentiality and privacy, and device dependability. For providers, digital medicine changes the relationship where trust can be verified, clinicians can be monitored, expectations must be managed, and new liability risks may be assumed. Other ethical questions include direct third-party monitoring of health treatment, affordability, and planning for adverse events in the case of device malfunction. This article seeks to lay out the ethical landscape for the implementation of such devices in patient care.
Keywords: bioethics; digital medicine; nonadherence; professionalism; trust.
Comment in
-
Digital Medicine and Ethics: Rooting for Evidence.Am J Bioeth. 2018 Sep;18(9):49-51. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1498955. Am J Bioeth. 2018. PMID: 30235092 No abstract available.
-
Digital Medicine, Cybersecurity, and Ethics: An Uneasy Relationship.Am J Bioeth. 2018 Sep;18(9):52-53. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1498935. Am J Bioeth. 2018. PMID: 30235094 No abstract available.
-
Resisting the Digital Medicine Panopticon: Toward a Bioethics of the Oppressed.Am J Bioeth. 2018 Sep;18(9):62-64. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1498936. Am J Bioeth. 2018. PMID: 30235095 No abstract available.
-
Digital Medicine: An Opportunity to Revisit the Role of Bioethicists.Am J Bioeth. 2018 Sep;18(9):69-70. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1498952. Am J Bioeth. 2018. PMID: 30235097 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Adherence, Surveillance, and Technological Hubris.Am J Bioeth. 2018 Sep;18(9):61-62. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1498953. Am J Bioeth. 2018. PMID: 30235098 No abstract available.
-
Surveillance and Digital Health.Am J Bioeth. 2018 Sep;18(9):67-68. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1498954. Am J Bioeth. 2018. PMID: 30235099 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Policing Compliance: Digital Medicine and Criminal Justice-Involved Persons.Am J Bioeth. 2018 Sep;18(9):57-58. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1498937. Am J Bioeth. 2018. PMID: 30235101 No abstract available.
-
Getting Off the Leash.Am J Bioeth. 2018 Sep;18(9):48-49. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1498938. Am J Bioeth. 2018. PMID: 30235102 No abstract available.
-
Surveillance Medicine in the DigitalEra: Lessons From Addiction Treatment.Am J Bioeth. 2018 Sep;18(9):58-60. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1499832. Am J Bioeth. 2018. PMID: 30265603 No abstract available.
-
Smart Pills for Psychosis: The Tricky Ethical Challenges of Digital Medicine for Serious Mental Illness.Am J Bioeth. 2018 Sep;18(9):65-67. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1498948. Am J Bioeth. 2018. PMID: 30265606 No abstract available.
-
Dependence on Digital Medicine in Resource-Limited Settings.Am J Bioeth. 2018 Sep;18(9):54-56. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1498949. Am J Bioeth. 2018. PMID: 30265607 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources