It is ethical to diagnose a public figure one has not personally examined
- PMID: 30236170
- DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2018.132
It is ethical to diagnose a public figure one has not personally examined
Erratum in
-
It is ethical to diagnose a public figure one has not personally examined - CORRIGENDUM.Br J Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;214(4):239. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2018.285. Epub 2018 Dec 6. Br J Psychiatry. 2019. PMID: 30518438 No abstract available.
Abstract
Should psychiatrists be able to speculate in the press or social media about their theories? John Gartner argues the risk to warn the public of concerns about public figures overrides the duty of confidentiality; whereas Alex Langford suggests this is beyond the ethical remit of psychiatric practice.Declaration of interestA.O'B is joint debates and analysis Editor of the British Journal of Psychiatry. J.G. is the founder of Duty To Warn, an association of mental health professionals who advocate the president's removal under the 25th Amendment on the grounds that he is psychologically unfit and dangerous.
Keywords: Diagnosis; history of psychiatry; media.
Comment in
-
Scapegoating mentally ill people.Br J Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;215(2):504-505. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.148. Br J Psychiatry. 2019. PMID: 31288887 No abstract available.
-
Gartner is a clinical psychologist.Br J Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;215(2):505. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.149. Br J Psychiatry. 2019. PMID: 31288888 No abstract available.
-
Ethics of debating if it is ethical to diagnose public figures!Br J Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;215(2):505. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.150. Br J Psychiatry. 2019. PMID: 31288889 No abstract available.
-
Editors' response.Br J Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;215(2):505-506. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.151. Br J Psychiatry. 2019. PMID: 31288890 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
