Surgical management of carcinoma in situ at ductal resection margins in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
- PMID: 30238077
- PMCID: PMC6139714
- DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12196
Surgical management of carcinoma in situ at ductal resection margins in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
Abstract
Recent advances in dimensional imaging, surgical technique, and perioperative patient care have resulted in increased rates of complete resection with histopathologically negative margins and improved surgical outcomes in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. However, achieving cancer-free resection margins at ductal stumps in surgery for this disease remains challenging because of longitudinal extension, which is one of the hallmarks of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. When the ductal resection margins are shown to be positive on examination of frozen sections, discrimination between carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma is clinically important because residual carcinoma in situ may lead to late local recurrence whereas residual invasive carcinoma is associated with early local recurrence. Residual invasive carcinoma at the ductal margins should be avoided whenever technically feasible. Residual "carcinoma in situ" at the ductal margins appears to be allowed in resection for the advanced disease because it has less effect on survival than other adverse prognostic factors (pN1 and/ or pM1). However, in surgery for early-stage (pTis-2N0M0) extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, residual carcinoma in situ at the ductal margins may have an adverse effect on long-term survival, so should be avoided whenever possible. In this review, we focus on the histopathological term "carcinoma in situ," the biological behavior of residual carcinoma in situ at ductal resection margins, intraoperative histological examination of the ductal resection margins, outcome of additional resection for positive ductal margins, and adjuvant therapy for patients with positive margins.
Keywords: additional resection; bile duct neoplasm; carcinoma in situ; cholangiocarcinoma; ductal resection margin status.
Similar articles
-
Impact of ductal resection margin status on long-term survival in patients undergoing resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Cancer. 2005 Mar 15;103(6):1210-6. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20906. Cancer. 2005. PMID: 15685618
-
Significance of ductal margin status in patients undergoing surgical resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.World J Surg. 2007 Sep;31(9):1788-1796. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9102-7. Epub 2007 Jul 25. World J Surg. 2007. PMID: 17647056
-
Residual Carcinoma In Situ at the Ductal Stump has a Negative Survival Effect: An Analysis of Early-stage Cholangiocarcinomas.Ann Surg. 2017 Jul;266(1):126-132. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001944. Ann Surg. 2017. PMID: 27501166
-
Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for anastomotic recurrence from residual cholangiocarcinoma: report of a case.Surg Today. 2014 May;44(5):952-6. doi: 10.1007/s00595-013-0578-5. Epub 2013 May 24. Surg Today. 2014. PMID: 23702706 Review.
-
Does Intraoperative Frozen Section and Revision of Margins Lead to Improved Survival in Patients Undergoing Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Nov;29(12):7592-7602. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12041-x. Epub 2022 Jun 25. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35752725
Cited by
-
The Prognostic Role of True Radical Resection in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma after Improved Evaluation of Radial Margin Status.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Dec 12;14(24):6126. doi: 10.3390/cancers14246126. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36551610 Free PMC article.
-
Cancerization of ducts in hilar cholangiocarcinoma.Virchows Arch. 2022 Aug;481(2):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s00428-022-03333-4. Epub 2022 May 9. Virchows Arch. 2022. PMID: 35527321
-
Significance of dysplasia in bile duct resection margin in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A retrospective analysis.World J Clin Cases. 2022 Apr 6;10(10):3078-3087. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i10.3078. World J Clin Cases. 2022. PMID: 35647116 Free PMC article.
-
Residual biliary intraepithelial neoplasia without malignant transformation at resection margin for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma does not require expanded resection: a dual center retrospective study.World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun 21;22(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03395-5. World J Surg Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38907218 Free PMC article.
-
Indications for resection of recurrent lesions in patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma based on prognostic factors: a single-institute retrospective study and brief literature review.BMC Surg. 2022 Dec 12;22(1):423. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01879-3. BMC Surg. 2022. PMID: 36503431 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al., editors. American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer, 2010; p. 219–33.
-
- Nagorney DM, Pawlik TM, Chun YS, Ebata T, Vauthey JN. Perihilar bile ducts In: American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual, 8th edn Amin MB, Edge SB, Greene FL, Byrd DR, Brookland RK, Washington MK, Gershenwald JE, Compton CC, Hess KR, Sullivan DC, Jessup JM, Brierley JD, Caspar LE, Schilsky RL, Balch CM, Winchester DP, Asare EA, Madera M, Gress DM, Meyer LR. (eds). New York, NY: Springer; 2017: pp. 311–25.
-
- Nagino M, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, et al. Evolution of surgical treatment for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a single‐center 34‐year review of 574 consecutive resections. Ann Surg. 2013;258:129–40. - PubMed
-
- Natsume S, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, et al. Clinical significance of left trisectionectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: an appraisal and comparison with left hepatectomy. Ann Surg. 2012;255:754–62. - PubMed
-
- Croome KP, Rosen CB, Heimbach JK, Nagorney DM. Is Liver transplantation appropriate for patients with potentially resectable de novo hilar cholangiocarcinoma? J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221:130–9. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous