Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec;16(4):471-488.
doi: 10.1002/msc.1362. Epub 2018 Sep 20.

Measurements of self-efficacy in musculoskeletal rehabilitation: A systematic review

Affiliations

Measurements of self-efficacy in musculoskeletal rehabilitation: A systematic review

Kelsey J Picha et al. Musculoskeletal Care. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: Low self-efficacy is a barrier to rehabilitation adherence. Before an intervention can be implemented to improve self-efficacy, assessment is required. It is currently unknown if a standard measure of self-efficacy has been used to assess this in patients with musculoskeletal conditions, specifically for home exercise programmes (HEPs). The aim of the present study was to determine which self-efficacy scales are being used in conjunction with exercise adherence, identify if any scale has been developed to evaluate self-efficacy for HEPs and evaluate their psychometric properties.

Methods: Data sources included CINAHL, MEDLINE, Pubmed, PsycInfo, and Sport Discus. Studies had to include patients suffering from a musculoskeletal injury, pain or disorder; a measure of rehabilitation adherence; and patient's self-efficacy. The study population, self-efficacy measurement used, study quality as identified with the Modified Downs and Black checklist, results pertaining to self-efficacy, and level of evidence were extracted. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed and 29 articles were included.

Results: A total of 14 scales assessing self-efficacy were identified but no scale to assess self-efficacy for HEPs was found. Many scales report internal consistency but lack test-retest reliability and validity.

Conclusions: The scales identified were specific to condition or tasks, and not applicable for all musculoskeletal patient populations. It is important, both for use in the clinic and for research, that outcome measures used are reliable and valid. Unfortunately, no scale was found to assess self-efficacy for HEPs, which is problematic as self-efficacy is task specific. As HEPs are essential to rehabilitation, there should be a scale designed specifically to assess self-efficacy for this task.

Keywords: adherence; assessment; patient barriers; social cognitive theory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors do not have any conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Modified from Picha & Howell, 2017 self-efficacy model for improved adherence to home exercise programmes (HEPs)
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Systematic search strategy

References

    1. Altmaier E, Russell D, Kao C, Lehmann T, & Weinstein J (1993). Role of self-efficacy in rehabilitation outcome among chronic low back pain patients. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40(3), 335–339.
    1. Altman D (1991). Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall.
    1. Andersen L (2011). Influence of psychosocial work environment on adherence to workplace exercise. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 53(2), 182–184. 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181207a01f - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson KO, Dowds BN, Pelletz RE, Edwards WT, & Peeters-Asdourian C (1995). Development and initial validation of a scale to measure self-efficacy beliefs in patients with chronic pain. Pain, 63(1), 77–84. - PubMed
    1. Baker KR, Nelson ME, Felson DT, Layne JE, Sarno R, & Roubenoff R (2001). The efficacy of home based progressive strength training in older adults with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Rheumatology, 28(7), 1655–1665. - PubMed

Publication types