Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov;61(11):1316-1319.
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001215.

Perineal Stapled Rectal Prolapse Resection in Elderly Patients: Long-term Follow-up

Affiliations

Perineal Stapled Rectal Prolapse Resection in Elderly Patients: Long-term Follow-up

Edward Ram et al. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Full-thickness rectal prolapse has a significant negative impact on quality of life. The therapeutic options, specifically in elderly patients, are imperfect. Perineal stapled rectal prolapse resection is a novel operation for treating external rectal prolapse. Long-term follow-up following this procedure is lacking. In our study, we report a long-term follow-up of 30 patients, analyzing the long-term recurrence rate, morbidity, and functional outcome.

Objective: This study aimed to examine the long-term results of perineal stapled rectal resection in a population unfit for prolonged general anesthesia.

Design: This was a cohort study with a prospective follow-up.

Settings: This study was conducted at a single tertiary referral center.

Patients: Patients undergoing perineal stapled rectal resection from January 2010 to June 2013 were included.

Interventions: Perineal stapled rectal prolapse resection was performed.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measured was prolapse recurrence.

Results: A total of 30 patients underwent the surgical intervention. The median follow-up period was 61 months (range, 37-65). No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. Six patients (20%) had recurrent rectal prolapse, and continence was not achieved in any of the patients. Two patients who had recurrence underwent a redo perineal stapled rectal resection.

Limitations: This study was limited by the small cohort of selected patients.

Conclusions: Frail patients that can only endure a short procedure under regional anesthesia should be considered for perineal stapled rectal prolapse resection. The lack of mortality and morbidity, specifically in this population, along with the low long-term recurrence rates, make this a favorable surgical alternative. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A745.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources