Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia Treatment Outcomes After Nerve Section, Microvascular Decompression, or Stereotactic Radiosurgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Background: Glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN) is a rare neuralgic pain syndrome amenable to neurosurgical treatments, including nerve section (NS), microvascular decompression (MVD), and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). However, thorough comparisons of the modalities have not been performed to date. The objective of the present study was to compare the pain and complication outcomes after these approaches to GPN.

Methods: Searches of 7 electronic databases from inception to June 2018 were conducted following the appropriate guidelines. The incidence rates (IRs) of short-term (≤3 months) and long-term (≥12 months) pain relief and complications were extracted and analyzed using a meta-analysis. Meta-regression was used to assess for heterogeneity.

Results: A total of 792 GPN cases managed by NS, MVD, or SRS were described by 6, 11, and 6 studies, reporting outcomes for 282 (36%), 446 (56%), and 67 (8%) cases. The short-term pain relief rate was highest after NS postoperatively (IR, 94%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 88%-98%) and lowest after SRS at 3 months postoperatively (IR, 80%; 95% CI, 68%-96%). The postoperative complication rate was greatest after MVD (IR, 26%; 95% CI, 16%-38%) and lowest after SRS (IR, 0%; 95% CI, 0%-4%). The long-term pain relief rate was greatest after NS (IR, 96%; 95% CI, 91%-99%) and lowest after SRS (IR, 82%; 95% CI, 67%-94%). Statistically significant differences between the approaches were found for each outcome.

Conclusion: Neurosurgical treatment of GPN is frequently performed by 1 of 3 modalities with unique outcomes profiles. NS might provide the most favorable treatment response, with respect to short- and long-term pain relief and postoperative outcomes.

Keywords: Glossopharyngeal neuralgia; Meta-analysis; Microvascular decompression; Nerve section; Pain relief; Palsy; Stereotactic radiosurgery.