Service provision of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome in public and private healthcare sectors: a qualitative study with obstetric providers
- PMID: 30241520
- PMCID: PMC6150999
- DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3540-9
Service provision of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome in public and private healthcare sectors: a qualitative study with obstetric providers
Abstract
Background: Cell-free fetal DNA sequencing based non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for Down syndrome (DS) has become widely available. In Hong Kong, obstetric providers in the public sector refer women identified at high risk of having a child with Down syndrome to obstetric providers in the private sector for NIPT. Little is known about how the NIPT has been adopted in the public sector where DS screening is provided for free of charge. The study aimed to identify the factors influencing providers' role enactment, such as consultation and referral, in the service provision of NIPT for DS in public and private healthcare sectors.
Methods: In-depth interviews were conducted with 20 obstetric providers offering NIPT in Hong Kong. Thematic narrative analysis was used to identify (i) the factors considered by participants when referring women for NIPT for Down syndrome in public and private healthcare sectors and (ii) their perceptions of the need to integrate NIPT into the current public antenatal service.
Results: Participants raised concerns about the lack of transparent referral guideline between public and private sectors for NIPT. Public obstetric providers reported little obligation to provide women with much information about risks and benefits of NIPT as it was not provided by public sectors. Some private providers assumed that women referred from the public sector had already received sufficient information about NIPT. The providers were also concerned about potential application of NIPT for further detection without regulation.
Conclusions: Although the providers had good knowledge of clinical advantages of NIPT over conventional screening, they were uncertain about how to introduce NIPT to women. Guidelines are necessary to enable better coordination of public and private sectors services to enable women to make informed choices about the uptake of NIPT.
Keywords: Down syndrome screening; Healthcare delivery; Hong Kong; Implementation; Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT); Qualitative study; Service provision.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong – New Territories East Cluster Clinical Research Ethics Committee approved this study. A written informed consent was obtained from all study participants.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Similar articles
-
Obstetric professionals' perceptions of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: clinical usefulness compared with existing tests and ethical implications.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Sep 5;17(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1474-6. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017. PMID: 28870159 Free PMC article.
-
Motivations for undertaking DNA sequencing-based non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy: a qualitative study with early adopter patients in Hong Kong.PLoS One. 2013 Nov 27;8(11):e81794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081794. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24312358 Free PMC article.
-
National data on the early clinical use of non-invasive prenatal testing in public and private healthcare in Denmark 2013-2017.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 May;100(5):884-892. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14052. Epub 2021 Feb 24. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021. PMID: 33230826
-
The implementation and impact of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for Down's syndrome into antenatal screening programmes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2024 May 16;19(5):e0298643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298643. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38753891 Free PMC article.
-
Facilitating informed choice about non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of women's experiences.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Jan 14;19(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2168-4. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019. PMID: 30642270 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Healthcare professionals' perspectives on and experiences with non-invasive prenatal testing: a systematic review.Hum Genet. 2025 Apr;144(4):343-374. doi: 10.1007/s00439-025-02736-y. Epub 2025 Apr 9. Hum Genet. 2025. PMID: 40205233 Free PMC article.
-
Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT): Reliability, Challenges, and Future Directions.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Aug 2;13(15):2570. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13152570. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37568933 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Views and attitudes about the offer of NIPT: a qualitative study of UK healthcare professionals.BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jul 19;26(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01227-z. BMC Med Ethics. 2025. PMID: 40684204 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical