Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 21;18(1):728.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3516-9.

Qualitative perspectives of primary care providers who treat Medicaid managed care patients

Affiliations

Qualitative perspectives of primary care providers who treat Medicaid managed care patients

Sarah H Gordon et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Declining job satisfaction and concurrent reductions in Medicaid participation among primary care providers have been documented, but there is limited qualitative work detailing their first-hand experiences treating Medicaid patients. The objective of this study is to describe the experiences of some primary care providers who treat Medicaid patients using in-depth qualitative analysis.

Methods: We conducted qualitative interviews with 15 primary care providers treating Medicaid patients in a Northeastern state. Participant recruitment efforts focused on including different types of primary care providers practicing in diverse settings. Qualitative interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview protocol. We developed a coding scheme to analyze interview transcripts and identify themes.

Results: Providers expressed challenges effectively meeting their patients' needs under current policy. They described low Medicaid reimbursement and underinvestment in care coordination programs to adequately address the social determinants of health. Providers shared other concerns including poor access to behavioral health services, discontinuous Medicaid coverage due to enrollment and renewal policies, and limited reimbursement for alternative pain treatment. Providers offered their own suggestions for the allocation of financial investments, Medicaid policy, and primary care practice.

Conclusions: Underinvestment in primary care in Medicaid may detract from providers' professional satisfaction and hinder care coordination for Medicaid patients with complex healthcare needs. Policy solutions that improve the experience of primary care providers serving Medicaid patients are urgently needed to ensure sustainability of the workforce and improve care delivery.

Keywords: Managed care; Medicaid; Primary care; Qualitative; Vulnerable populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Brown University Internal Review Board waived the need for this project’s review. They determined the research did not involve human subjects because we were obtaining provider insights in their professional capacity. All participants were exempt from providing consent as they were providing their opinions in their professional capacities.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Leiyu S. The impact of primary care: A focused review. Scientifica. 2012;2012:432892. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Macinko J, Starfield B, Shi L. Quantifying the health benefits of primary care physician supply in the United States. Int J Health Serv. 2007;37(1):111–126. doi: 10.2190/3431-G6T7-37M8-P224. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Friedberg MW, Hussey PS, Schneider EC. Primary care: a critical review of the evidence on quality and costs of health care. Health Aff. 2010;29(5):766–772. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smetana GW, Landon BE, Bindman AB, et al. A comparison of outcomes resulting from generalist vs specialist care for a single discrete medical condition: a systematic review and methodologic critique. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(1):10–20. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.1.10. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Engström S, Foldevi M, Borgquist L. Is general practice effective? A systematic literature review. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2001;19(2):131–144. doi: 10.1080/028134301750235394. - DOI - PubMed