Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun;15(6):801-805.
doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.08.013. Epub 2018 Sep 18.

Deprescribing: Future directions for research

Affiliations

Deprescribing: Future directions for research

Wade Thompson et al. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

A World Café workshop was held at the Bruyère Evidence-Based Deprescribing Guidelines Symposium in March 2018 with 30 participants (researchers, clinicians, policy makers, stakeholders). This workshop explored priorities for future work in the field of deprescribing and deprescribing guidelines through group discussion. The discussions were guided by the following questions: (1) What are deprescribing research priorities (to inform guideline development), (2) What outcome measures are important for developing deprescribing guidelines, and (3) How do we evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of deprescribing guidelines? Discussion from all 3 questions identified 6 main priority areas: (1) conducting high-quality and long-term clinical trials that measure patient-important outcomes, (2) focusing on patient involvement and perspectives, (3) investigating the pharmacoeconomics of deprescribing interventions, (4) understanding deprescribing interventions in different populations, (5) generating evidence on clinical management during deprescribing (e.g. managing adverse drug withdrawal effects, subsequent re-prescribing), and (6) implementing interventions in clinical practice. These topics represent what a group of experienced researchers, clinicians, and stakeholders in the field collectively felt was important to consider for design and implementation of future deprescribing studies. The aim is for these findings to stimulate future discussions and be considered by granting agencies, policy makers, deprescribing research networks, and individual researchers planning future deprescribing studies.

Keywords: Deprescribing; Guidelines; Polypharmacy; Research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

Dr. Thompson reports honoraria for deprescribing presentations from University of Ottawa , University of British Columbia and Ontario Long-Term Care Clinicians Conference. Dr. Reeve reports grants from Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)-Australian Research Council (ARC), a research award from the Bupa Health Foundation and deprescribing presentation fees from the Pharmacy Association of Nova Scotia and the Swiss Society of Internal Medicine. Dr. McCarthy reports travel support for a presentation from NHS England. Dr. Farrell reports honoraria for deprescribing presentations from College of Psychiatric and Neurologic Pharmacists, European Association of Hospital Pharmacists, Nova Scotia College of Pharmacists. Drs. Farrell and Conklin received a stipend from the Institute for Healthcare Improvement for advice and review of documents related to introducing deprescribing into the US healthcare system.

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
Summary of deprescribing research priorities.

References

    1. Iyer S, Naganathan V, Mclachlan AJ, Couteur DG Le. Medication Withdrawal Trials in People Aged 65 Years and Older A Systematic Review. Drugs Aging. 2008;25(12):1021–1031. - PubMed
    1. Gnjidic D, Le Couteur DG, Kouladjian L, Hilmer SN. Deprescribing Trials: Methods to Reduce Polypharmacy and the Impact on Prescribing and Clinical Outcomes. Clin Geriatr Med. 2012;28(2):237–253. doi:10.1016/j.cger.2012.01.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reeve E, Thompson W, Farrell B. Deprescribing: A narrative review of the evidence and practical recommendations for recognizing opportunities and taking action. Eur J Intern Med. 2017;38:3–11. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2016.12.021 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Page AT, Clifford RM, Potter K, Schwartz D, Etherton-Beer CD. The feasibility and effect of deprescribing in older adults on mortality and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;82(3):583–623. doi:10.1111/bcp.12975 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weir K, Nickel B, Naganathan V, et al. Decision-Making Preferences and Deprescribing: Perspectives of Older Adults and Companions About Their Medicines. Journals Gerontol Ser B. 2017;0(0):1–10. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbx138 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types