Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov;31(11):1203-1208.
doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Sep 18.

Differential Clinical Implications of Current Recommendations for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function by Echocardiography

Laura Sanchis  1 , Rut Andrea  2 , Carlos Falces  2 , Silvia Poyatos  2 , Bàrbara Vidal  2 , Marta Sitges  2
Affiliations

Differential Clinical Implications of Current Recommendations for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function by Echocardiography

Laura Sanchis et al. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Classification of left ventricular diastolic function (LVDF) by echocardiography is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the last 2016 recommendations for LVDF evaluation on brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels, proportion of final heart failure (HF) diagnosis, and cardiovascular outcomes.

Methods: Outpatients with first consultation at a one-stop HF clinic (2009-2014) were screened. The initial visit included echocardiography with LVDF evaluation and determination of BNP level. HF diagnosis was confirmed or ruled out at the end of the visit. Cardiovascular events during follow-up were recorded. LVDF classification was originally performed with the 2009 recommendations and reevaluated using the 2016 recommendations.

Results: A total of 157 patients (mean age 73.24 ± 10.3 years; 70.1% women) were included. Originally (2009 recommendations), most of the patients were classified with grade I diastolic dysfunction (DD; 67.5%). After the reanalysis using the 2016 recommendations, 49% were reclassified with normal LVDF. These subjects showed lower BNP levels (40.8 pg/mL) and a lower proportion of HF diagnosis (9.6%). Another part of the initial grade I DD group (31.1%) was reclassified with indeterminate LVDF; they had intermediate BNP levels, proportion of HF, and rate of cardiovascular events. Lower reclassification rates were observed in the other groups of DD. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed significantly better prognostic stratification after the reclassification (P = .539 vs P = .003).

Conclusions: Current recommendations for the evaluation of LVDF by echocardiography resulted in more accurate classification of patients, according to their BNP levels, HF diagnosis, and cardiovascular outcomes, especially for those patients previously classified with grade I DD.

Keywords: ASE/EACVI recommendations; Diastolic dysfunction evaluation; Diastolic function; Echocardiography; Outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in