Meiotic Double-Strand Break Proteins Influence Repair Pathway Utilization
- PMID: 30242011
- PMCID: PMC6218235
- DOI: 10.1534/genetics.118.301402
Meiotic Double-Strand Break Proteins Influence Repair Pathway Utilization
Abstract
Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are among the most deleterious lesions DNA can endure. Yet, DSBs are programmed at the onset of meiosis, and are required to facilitate appropriate reduction of ploidy in daughter cells. Repair of these breaks is tightly controlled to favor homologous recombination (HR)-the only repair pathway that can form crossovers. However, little is known about how the activities of alternative repair pathways are regulated at these stages. We discovered an unexpected synthetic interaction between the DSB machinery and strand-exchange proteins. Depleting the Caenorhabditis elegans DSB-promoting factors HIM-5 and DSB-2 suppresses the formation of chromosome fusions that arise in the absence of RAD-51 or other strand-exchange mediators. Our investigations reveal that nonhomologous and theta-mediated end joining (c-NHEJ and TMEJ, respectively) and single strand annealing (SSA) function redundantly to repair DSBs when HR is compromised, and that HIM-5 influences the utilization of TMEJ and SSA.
Keywords: C. elegans; DNA repair; WormBase; double-strand break; meiosis; pathway choice.
Copyright © 2018 by the Genetics Society of America.
Figures







Similar articles
-
Single-strand annealing mediates the conservative repair of double-strand DNA breaks in homologous recombination-defective germ cells of Caenorhabditis elegans.DNA Repair (Amst). 2019 Mar;75:18-28. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 Jan 24. DNA Repair (Amst). 2019. PMID: 30710866
-
Interdependent and separable functions of Caenorhabditis elegans MRN-C complex members couple formation and repair of meiotic DSBs.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 May 8;115(19):E4443-E4452. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1719029115. Epub 2018 Apr 23. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018. PMID: 29686104 Free PMC article.
-
COM-1 promotes homologous recombination during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis by antagonizing Ku-mediated non-homologous end joining.PLoS Genet. 2013;9(2):e1003276. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003276. Epub 2013 Feb 7. PLoS Genet. 2013. PMID: 23408909 Free PMC article.
-
Meiotic recombination and the crossover assurance checkpoint in Caenorhabditis elegans.Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2016 Jun;54:106-16. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.03.014. Epub 2016 Mar 21. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2016. PMID: 27013114 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Repair Pathway Choices and Consequences at the Double-Strand Break.Trends Cell Biol. 2016 Jan;26(1):52-64. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Oct 1. Trends Cell Biol. 2016. PMID: 26437586 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Meiotic sister chromatid exchanges are rare in C. elegans.Curr Biol. 2021 Apr 12;31(7):1499-1507.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.11.018. Epub 2021 Mar 18. Curr Biol. 2021. PMID: 33740426 Free PMC article.
-
A pathway for error-free non-homologous end joining of resected meiotic double-strand breaks.Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Jan 25;49(2):879-890. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1205. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021. PMID: 33406239 Free PMC article.
-
BRCA1/BRC-1 and SMC-5/6 regulate DNA repair pathway engagement during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis.Elife. 2024 Aug 8;13:e80687. doi: 10.7554/eLife.80687. Elife. 2024. PMID: 39115289 Free PMC article.
-
R-loop-induced irreparable DNA damage evades checkpoint detection in the C. elegans germline.Nucleic Acids Res. 2022 Aug 12;50(14):8041-8059. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac621. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022. PMID: 35871299 Free PMC article.
-
ATM and ATR Influence Meiotic Crossover Formation Through Antagonistic and Overlapping Functions in Caenorhabditis elegans.Genetics. 2019 Jun;212(2):431-443. doi: 10.1534/genetics.119.302193. Epub 2019 Apr 23. Genetics. 2019. PMID: 31015193 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Agostinho A., Meier B., Sonneville R., Jagut M., Woglar A., et al. , 2013. Combinatorial regulation of meiotic Holliday junction resolution in C. elegans by HIM-6 (BLM) helicase, SLX-4, and the SLX-1, MUS-81 and XPF-1 nucleases. PLoS Genet. 9: e1003591 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003591 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Benjamini Y., Krieger A. M., Yekutieli D., 2006. Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate. Biometrika 93: 491–507. 10.1093/biomet/93.3.491 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials