Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec;34(6):1160-1166.
doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1422-9.

YouTube Videos as a Source of Information on Colorectal Cancer: What Do Our Patients Learn?

Alain Nathan Sahin  1   2 , Anne Sarah Sahin  1   2 , Frank Schwenter  1   2 , Herawaty Sebajang  3   4
Affiliations

YouTube Videos as a Source of Information on Colorectal Cancer: What Do Our Patients Learn?

Alain Nathan Sahin et al. J Cancer Educ. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

YouTube is the second most visited website in the world. No studies to date have characterized and evaluated YouTube videos on colorectal cancer (CRC) although these videos could influence patient decision-making, notably regarding screening and prevention. This study aims to report the characteristics and quality of these videos as patient education resources for CRC. YouTube's search engine was queried with different search phrases relating to CRC. The first two pages of each search result were analyzed. Two specialists devised a critical appraisal tool with a list of criteria to assess the videos. Quantitative YouTube parameter analyses and criteria assessment were performed. Inter-rater agreement was assessed between three raters. A total of 46 videos were eligible to be included in the study. The videos were on average 4:51 ± 3:27 min long. The videos had 10 times as many likes as dislikes. Less than half the videos discussed risk factors and protective factors. Only 41% of videos mentioned screening tests and only about a quarter discussed them. Palliative care was only mentioned in 2% of videos. A single video could obtain a perfect score on the critical appraisal tool. Length was the unique parameter associated with a high score on the criteria list. There is thus a need for more authoritative and comprehensive videos easily identifiable by the patients. Video popularity is not associated with comprehensiveness. Currently, YouTube might not be an education resource for CRC suited to every patient.

Keywords: Colon cancer; Informatics; Social media; YouTube; eHealth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of the search results and screening process
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Fox S (2011) Health topics. http://www.pewinternet.org/2011/02/01/health-topics-2/. Accessed 5 Mar 2018
    1. Wasserman M, Baxter NN, Rosen B, Burnstein M, Halverson AL. Systematic review of internet patient information on colorectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57(1):64–69. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McMullan M. Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient-health professional relationship. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;63(1–2):24–28. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Consent: Supported Decision-Making - a good practice guide 2016. 2016. Royal College of Surgeons England
    1. Marshall JH, Baker DM, Lee MJ, Jones GL, Lobo AJ, Brown SR. The assessment of online heath videos for surgery in Crohn's disease. Color Dis. 2018;20:606–613. doi: 10.1111/codi.14045. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources