High-versus low-dose caffeine in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Aim: Though caffeine is a consolidated treatment in preterm infants, the efficacy and safety of a higher dose have not been systematically appraised.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted to compare high (loading dose >20 mg/kg and maintenance >10 mg/kg/day) versus low dose of caffeine. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Central and conference proceedings for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs were searched. Two authors independently screened the records, extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias.

Results: As only six RCTs enrolling a total of 816 preterm infants were included, the required information size was not reached. The loading and maintenance doses varied between 20 and 80 mg/kg/day and 3 and 20 mg/kg/day, respectively. The use of high dose had no impact on mortality (RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.53-1.38; RCTs = 4). However, it resulted in fewer cases of extubation failure, apnoeas and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (RR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.60-0.96; studies = 4) and shorter duration of mechanical ventilation. The quality of the evidence was low due to imprecision of the estimates.

Conclusion: Due to imprecision, it is not possible to determine whether high-dose caffeine is more effective and safe than a low dose. High dose might improve short-term respiratory function and reduce bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Keywords: Cerebral palsy; Dose-response; Evidence-based medicine; Methylxanthine; Optimal information size.