Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun;60(6):777-787.
doi: 10.1177/0284185118801127. Epub 2018 Sep 23.

Intergrating conventional MRI, texture analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and susceptibility weighted imaging for glioma grading

Affiliations

Intergrating conventional MRI, texture analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and susceptibility weighted imaging for glioma grading

Chun-Qiu Su et al. Acta Radiol. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The application of conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in glioma grading is limited and non-specific.

Purpose: To investigate the application values of MRI, texture analysis (TA) of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and intratumoral susceptibility signal (ITSS) on susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI), alone and in combination, for glioma grading.

Material and methods: Fifty-two patients with pathologically confirmed gliomas who underwent DCE-MRI and SWI were enrolled in this retrospective study. Conventional MRIs were evaluated by the VASARI scoring system. TA of DCE-MRI-derived parameters and the degree of ITSS were compared between low-grade gliomas (LGGs) and high-grade gliomas (HGGs). The diagnostic ability of each parameter and their combination for glioma grading were analyzed.

Results: Significant statistical differences in VASARI features were observed between LGGs and HGGs ( P < 0.05), of which the enhancement quality had the highest area under the curve (AUC) (0.873) with 93.3% sensitivity and 80% specificity. The TA of DCE-MRI derived parameters were significantly different between LGGs and HGGs ( P < 0.05), of which the uniformity of Ktrans had the highest AUC (0.917) with 93.3% sensitivity and 90% specificity. The degree of ITSS was significantly different between LGGs and HGGs ( P < 0.001). The AUC of the ITSS was 0.925 with 93.3% sensitivity and 90% specificity. The best discriminative power was obtained from a combination of enhancement quality, Ktrans- uniformity, and ITSS, resulting in 96.7% sensitivity, 100.0% specificity, and AUC of 0.993.

Conclusion: Combining conventional MRI, TA of DCE-MRI, and ITSS on SWI may help to improve the differentiation between LGGs and HGGs.

Keywords: Glioma; dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI; susceptibility weighted imaging; texture analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources