Current state of fabrication technologies and materials for bone tissue engineering
- PMID: 30248515
- DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.09.031
Current state of fabrication technologies and materials for bone tissue engineering
Abstract
A range of traditional and free-form fabrication technologies have been investigated and, in numerous occasions, commercialized for use in the field of regenerative tissue engineering (TE). The demand for technologies capable of treating bone defects inherently difficult to repair has been on the rise. This quest, accompanied by the advent of functionally tailored, biocompatible, and biodegradable materials, has garnered an enormous research interest in bone TE. As a result, different materials and fabrication methods have been investigated towards this end, leading to a deeper understanding of the geometrical, mechanical and biological requirements associated with bone scaffolds. As our understanding of the scaffold requirements expands, so do the capability requirements of the fabrication processes. The goal of this review is to provide a broad examination of existing scaffold fabrication processes and highlight future trends in their development. To appreciate the clinical requirements of bone scaffolds, a brief review of the biological process by which bone regenerates itself is presented first. This is followed by a summary and comparisons of commonly used implant techniques to highlight the advantages of TE-based approaches over traditional grafting methods. A detailed discussion on the clinical and mechanical requirements of bone scaffolds then follows. The remainder of the manuscript is dedicated to current scaffold fabrication methods, their unique capabilities and perceived shortcomings. The range of biomaterials employed in each fabrication method is summarized. Selected traditional and non-traditional fabrication methods are discussed with a highlight on their future potential from the authors' perspective. This study is motivated by the rapidly growing demand for effective scaffold fabrication processes capable of economically producing constructs with intricate and precisely controlled internal and external architectures. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: The manuscript summarizes the current state of fabrication technologies and materials used for creating scaffolds in bone tissue engineering applications. A comprehensive analysis of different fabrication methods (traditional and free-form) were summarized in this review paper, with emphasis on recent developments in the field. The fabrication techniques suitable for creating scaffolds for tissue engineering was particularly targeted and their use in bone tissue engineering were articulated. Along with the fabrication techniques, we emphasized the choice of materials in these processes. Considering the limitations of each process, we highlighted the materials and the material properties critical in that particular process and provided a brief rational for the choice of the materials. The functional performance for bone tissue engineering are summarized for different fabrication processes and the choice of biomaterials. Finally, we provide a perspective on the future of the field, highlighting the knowledge gaps and promising avenues in pursuit of effective scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. This extensive review of the field will provide research community with a reference source for current approaches to scaffold preparation. We hope to encourage the researchers to generate next generation biomaterials to be used in these fabrication processes. By providing both advantages and disadvantage of each fabrication method in detail, new fabrication techniques might be devised that will overcome the limitations of the current approaches. These studies should facilitate the efforts of researchers interested in generating ideal scaffolds, and should have applications beyond the repair of bone tissue.
Keywords: Additive manufacturing; Binder jetting,; Bone scaffolds; Cryogelation; Electrospinning; Gas foaming; Material extrusion; Selective laser melting; Selective laser sintering; Tissue engineering; Vat photoplymerization.
Copyright © 2018 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Silk scaffolds in bone tissue engineering: An overview.Acta Biomater. 2017 Nov;63:1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.09.027. Epub 2017 Sep 20. Acta Biomater. 2017. PMID: 28941652 Review.
-
Three-dimensional (3D) printed scaffold and material selection for bone repair.Acta Biomater. 2019 Jan 15;84:16-33. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.11.039. Epub 2018 Nov 24. Acta Biomater. 2019. PMID: 30481607 Review.
-
Development of biomimetic electrospun polymeric biomaterials for bone tissue engineering. A review.J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2019 Oct;30(14):1308-1355. doi: 10.1080/09205063.2019.1630699. Epub 2019 Jul 9. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2019. PMID: 31181982 Review.
-
Bone tissue engineering: Scaffold preparation using chitosan and other biomaterials with different design and fabrication techniques.Int J Biol Macromol. 2018 Nov;119:1228-1239. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.08.056. Epub 2018 Aug 11. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018. PMID: 30107161 Review.
-
3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds: From bone tissue engineering to tumor therapy.Acta Biomater. 2018 Oct 1;79:37-59. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.08.026. Epub 2018 Aug 28. Acta Biomater. 2018. PMID: 30165201 Review.
Cited by
-
Recent Advances in the Application of Natural and Synthetic Polymer-Based Scaffolds in Musculoskeletal Regeneration.Polymers (Basel). 2022 Oct 27;14(21):4566. doi: 10.3390/polym14214566. Polymers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36365559 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Scaffold-Mediated Gene Delivery for Osteochondral Repair.Pharmaceutics. 2020 Sep 29;12(10):930. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12100930. Pharmaceutics. 2020. PMID: 33003607 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Porous polyetheretherketone microcarriers fabricated via hydroxylation together with cell-derived mineralized extracellular matrix coatings promote cell expansion and bone regeneration.Regen Biomater. 2021 Mar 19;8(2):rbab013. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbab013. eCollection 2021 Mar. Regen Biomater. 2021. PMID: 33763233 Free PMC article.
-
Scaffold-based bone tissue engineering in microgravity: potential, concerns and implications.NPJ Microgravity. 2022 Oct 29;8(1):45. doi: 10.1038/s41526-022-00236-1. NPJ Microgravity. 2022. PMID: 36309540 Free PMC article. Review.
-
An injectable and self-healing hydrogel with dual physical crosslinking for in-situ bone formation.Mater Today Bio. 2023 Jan 24;19:100558. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100558. eCollection 2023 Apr. Mater Today Bio. 2023. PMID: 36747579 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials