Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Sep 24;18(1):132.
doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0583-8.

Comparison of analgesic effect of oxycodone and morphine on patients with moderate and advanced cancer pain: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Comparison of analgesic effect of oxycodone and morphine on patients with moderate and advanced cancer pain: a meta-analysis

Kai-Kai Guo et al. BMC Anesthesiol. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Morphine and oxycodone are considered as wide-spreadly used opioids for moderate/severe cancer pain. However, debate exists about the evidence regarding their relative tolerability and underlying results.

Methods: A systematic search of online electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library updated on October 2017 were conducted. The meta-analysis was performed including the studies that were designed as randomized controlled trials.

Results: In total, seven randomized clinical trials met our inclusion criteria. No statistical differences in analgesic effect between oxycodone and morphine were observed. Both the pooled analysis of API (MD =0.01, 95% CI -0.22 - 0.23; p = 0.96) and WPI (MD = - 0.05, 95% CI -0.21 - 0.30; p = 0.72) demonstrated clinical non-inferiority of the efficacy of morphine compared with oxycodone, respectively. Additionally, no significant difference in PRR response was observed in either oxycodone or morphine that were used in patients (MD =0.99, 95% CI -0.88 - 1.11; p = 0.87). With the pooled result of AEs indicating the comparable safety profiles between the 2 treatment groups, the meta-analysis on the nausea (OR = 1.20, 95% CI 0.90-1.59; p = 0.22), vomiting (OR = 1.33, 95% CI 0.75-2.38; p = 0.33), somnolence (OR = 1.35, 95% CI 0.95-1.93; p = 0.10), diarrhea (OR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.60-1,67; p = 0.98), and constipation (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.77-1.41; p = 0.79) was conducted, respectively.

Conclusions: In the current study, no remarkable difference was identified either in analgesic efficacy or in tolerability of oxycodone and morphine as the first-line therapy for patients with moderate to severe cancer pain. Thus, no sufficient clinical evidence on the superior effects of oxycodone to morphine was provided in this experimental hypothesis.

Keywords: Cancer pain; Meta-analysis; Morphine; Oxycodone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow chart of selection process to identify studies eligible for pooling
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Pooled analysis of PRR comparing oxycodone with morphine on patients with cancer pain
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Pooled analysis of API comparing oxycodone with morphine on patients with cancer pain
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Pooled analysis of WPI comparing oxycodone with morphine on patients with cancer pain
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Pooled analysis of nausea comparing oxycodone with morphine on patients with cancer pain
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Pooled analysis of vomiting comparing oxycodone with morphine on patients with cancer pain
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Pooled analysis of somnolence comparing oxycodone with morphine on patients with cancer pain
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Pooled analysis of diarrhea comparing oxycodone with morphine on patients with cancer pain
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Pooled analysis of constipation comparing oxycodone with morphine on patients with cancer pain

References

    1. Zech DF, Grond S, Lynch J, Hertel D, Lehmann KA. Validation of World Health Organization guidelines for cancer pain relief: a 10-year prospective study. Pain. 1995;63(1):65–76. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00017-M. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Portenoy RK. Managing cancer pain poorly responsive to systemic opioid therapy. Oncology (Williston Park) 1999;13(5 Suppl 2):25–29. - PubMed
    1. American Society of Anesthesiologists A report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on pain management, Cancer pain section. Anesthesiology. 1996;84:1243–1257. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199605000-00029. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization (WHO) Expert Committee. Cancer pain relief and palliative care. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1990. Technical report series, No. 804. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Cancer pain relief, second edition, with a guide to opioid availability. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1996.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources