Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul;29(4):473-480.
doi: 10.5152/tjg.2018.17400.

Clinical outcomes of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection and risk factors associated with piecemeal resection

Affiliations

Clinical outcomes of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection and risk factors associated with piecemeal resection

Myeongsook Seo et al. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul.

Abstract

Background/aims: We aimed to investigate the factors associated with piecemeal resection of colorectal neoplasia (CRN), in spite of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

Materials and methods: We analyzed the retrospective data for colorectal ESD cases from January 2005 to April 2014. We also reviewed the piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for CRNs ≥20 mm, performed over the same period.

Results: En bloc resection was possible in 648 (85.7%) of 756 lesions in 740 patients. Multivariate analysis showed that hybrid ESD (odds ratio (OR), 29.07; 95% confidence interval (CI), 15.46-54.65; p<0.01) and mild or severe submucosal fibrosis (OR, 3.62; 95% CI, 1.94-6.76; p<0.01) were independently associated with piecemeal ESD. The en bloc ESD group showed higher histologic complete resection rate than the piecemeal ESD group (80.4% vs. 56.5%; p<0.01), and the piecemeal ESD group showed higher recurrence rate than in the en bloc ESD group (5.6% [4/72] vs. 0.7% [3/450]; p<0.01). Overall recurrence rate was 1.3% (7/522).

Conclusion: Hybrid ESD and submucosal fibrosis are independently associated with piecemeal ESD. Piecemeal ESD cases recurred more frequently than en bloc ESD cases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram showing the categorization of lesions into the two treatment groups ESD: endoscopic submucosal dissection; GIST: gastrointestinal stromal tumor
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier plots in follow-up patients. Comparison of cumulative recurrence rates between en bloc ESD and piecemeal ESD groups (log rank test, p<0.001) ESD: endoscopic submucosal dissection

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y, et al. JGES guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Endosc. 2015;27:417–34. doi: 10.1111/den.12456. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oka S, Tanaka S, Saito Y, et al. Local recurrence after endoscopic resection for large colorectal neoplasia: a multicenter prospective study in Japan. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:697–707. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.96. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fujiya M, Tanaka K, Dokoshi T, et al. Efficacy and adverse events of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colon neoplasms: a meta-analysis of studies comparing EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:583–95. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.034. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Saito Y, Fukuzawa M, Matsuda T, et al. Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:343–52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0562-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee EJ, Lee JB, Lee SH, Youk EG. Endoscopic treatment of large colorectal tumors: comparison of endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting, and endoscopic submucosal dissection. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:2220–30. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2164-0. - DOI - PubMed