Exploring Genetic Data Across Individuals: Design and Evaluation of a Novel Comparative Report Tool
- PMID: 30249582
- PMCID: PMC6231826
- DOI: 10.2196/10297
Exploring Genetic Data Across Individuals: Design and Evaluation of a Novel Comparative Report Tool
Abstract
Background: The growth in the availability of personal genomic data to nonexperts poses multiple challenges to human-computer interaction research; data are highly sensitive, complex, and have health implications for individuals and families. However, there has been little research on how nonexpert users explore their genomic data.
Objective: We focus on how to support nonexperts in exploring and comparing their own personal genomic report with those of other people. We designed and evaluated CrossGenomics, a novel tool for comparing personal genetic reports, which enables exploration of shared and unshared genetic variants. Focusing on communicating comparative impact, rarity, and certainty, we evaluated alternative novel interactive prototypes.
Methods: We conducted 3 user studies. The first focuses on assessing the usability and understandability of a prototype that facilitates the comparison of reports from 2 family members. Following a design iteration, we studied how various prototypes support the comparison of genetic reports of a 4-person family. Finally, we evaluated the needs of early adopters-people who share their genetic reports publicly for comparing their genetic reports with that of others.
Results: In the first study, sunburst- and Venn-based comparisons of two genomes led to significantly higher domain comprehension, compared with the linear comparison and with the commonly used tabular format. However, results show gaps between objective and subjective comprehension, as sunburst users reported significantly lower perceived understanding and higher levels of confusion than the users of the tabular report. In the second study, users who were allowed to switch between the different comparison views presented higher comprehension levels, as well as more complex reasoning than users who were limited to a single comparison view. In the third study, 35% (17/49) reported learning something new from comparing their own data with another person's data. Users indicated that filtering and toggling between comparison views were the most useful features.
Conclusions: Our findings (1) highlight features and visualizations that show strengths in facilitating user comprehension of genomic data, (2) demonstrate the value of affording users the flexibility to examine the same report using multiple views, and (3) emphasize users' needs in comparison of genomic data. We conclude with design implications for engaging nonexperts with complex multidimensional genomic data.
Keywords: consumer health informatics; genomics.
©Lauren Westendorf, Orit Shaer, Christina Pollalis, Clarissa Verish, Oded Nov, Mad Price Ball. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 24.09.2018.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures
References
-
- Lupton D. M-health and health promotion: the digital cyborg and surveillance society. Soc Theory Health. 2012;10(3):229–244. doi: 10.1057/sth.2012.6. - DOI
-
- Kuznetsov S, Kittur A, Paulos E. Biological citizen publics: Personal genetics as a site of public engagement with science. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition. 2015 doi: 10.1145/2757226.2757246. - DOI
-
- Shaer O, Nov O, Okerlund J, Balestra M, Stowell E, Ascher L, Bi J, Schlenker C, Ball M. Informing the design of direct-to-consumer interactive personal genomics reports. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(6):e146. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4415. http://www.jmir.org/2015/6/e146/ v17i6e146 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Chae J. “Am I a better mother than you?” Media and 21st-century motherhood in the context of the social comparison theory. Commun Res. 2014 May 25;42(4):503–525. doi: 10.1177/0093650214534969. - DOI
-
- Seo M, Hyun KD. The effects of following celebrities' lives via SNSs on life satisfaction: the palliative function of system justification and the moderating role of materialism. New Media Soc. 2018 Jan 06;:-. doi: 10.1177/1461444817750002. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
