Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep;50(3):149-154.

Use of Thromboelastography to Predict Thrombotic Complications in Pediatric and Neonatal Extracorporeal Membranous Oxygenation

Affiliations

Use of Thromboelastography to Predict Thrombotic Complications in Pediatric and Neonatal Extracorporeal Membranous Oxygenation

Natalie Henderson et al. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2018 Sep.

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to investigate the correlation between thromboelastography (TEG) and conventional measures of anticoagulation, and to determine optimum values for citrated kaolin TEG R time (TEG RCK) and anti-Xa activity that would minimize both bleeding and thrombotic complications in pediatric and neonatal patients requiring extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO). A retrospective chart review of patients requiring veno-venous (VV) and venoarterial (VA) ECMO was performed. Combined medical and cardiac ICU within a single-center, tertiary care, freestanding, children's hospital. Non-pregnant patients <18 years and >2 kilograms requiring VV or VA ECMO from July 2013 through July 2015. Anti-Xa (OR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.53-0.72, p < .001) and TEG RCK (OR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.07-1.34, p = .003) were the only independent predictors for a significant thrombotic event. Receiver operating characteristic curves and traditional epidemiological data (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV) were used to determine optimal target Anti-Xa and TEG RCK values. No independent predictors for significant bleeding events were identified in this cohort. A anti-Xa activity of .25 IU/mL (sensitivity = 81%, specificity = 67%, PPV = 81%, NPV = 58%) and TEG RCK time of 17.85 minutes (sensitivity = 84%, specificity = 68%, PPV = 82%, NPV = 59%) were established as the optimal thresholds for preventing thrombotic events. Anti-Xa and TEG RCK were independent predictors of thrombosis in this cohort of pediatric and neonatal ECMO patients. Targeting an anti-Xa activity greater than .25 IU/mL and a TEG RCK greater than 17.85 minutes may minimize the risk of thrombosis in pediatric and neonatal ECMO patients. Future investigation should evaluate targets for anti-Xa and TEG RCK, which additionally minimize the risk of significant bleeding in this patient population.

Keywords: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; heparin management; neonatal; pediatrics; thromboelastography; thrombosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Anticoagulation test response table.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
ROC curves predicting a thrombotic event.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Werho DK, Pasquali SK, Yu S, et al. . Hemorrhagic complications in pediatric cardiac patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: An analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015;16:276–88. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kessel AD, Kline M, Zinger M, et al. . The impact and statistical analysis of a multifaceted anticoagulation strategy in children supported on ECMO: Performance and pitfalls. J Intensive Care Med. 2015;32:60. - PubMed
    1. Dalton HJ, Macrae DJ; Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference Group. Extracorporeal support in children with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: Proceedings from the pediatric acute lung injury consensus conference. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015;16(5 Suppl 1):S111–7. - PubMed
    1. Oliver WC. Anticoagulation and coagulation management for ECMO. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009;13:154–75. - PubMed
    1. Bolliger D, Zenklusen U, Tanaka KA. Point-of-care coagulation management algorithms during ECMO support: Are we there yet? Minerva Anestesiol. 2016;82:1008–9. - PubMed

MeSH terms