Evaluation of the rate of marginal ulcer formation after bariatric surgery using the MBSAQIP database
- PMID: 30251139
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6468-6
Evaluation of the rate of marginal ulcer formation after bariatric surgery using the MBSAQIP database
Abstract
Background: Marginal ulcer (MU) formation is a known problem after gastric bypass. The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database contains data from all US and Canadian Centers of Excellence including complication rates. We hypothesized that the short-term rate of ulceration is low.
Methods: We queried the MBSAQIP database for the year 2015. We searched patients with primary gastric bypass who developed MU. We then compared preoperative, operative, and postoperative characteristics with patients who did not develop MU.
Results: The incidence of MU in the entire cohort of GB patients was 155 of 44,379 (0.35%, 95% CI 0.297%, 0.409%). Among the 155 patients with an ulcer, 88 (57%) patients had only one procedure, 69 had an intervention (therapeutic or diagnostic endoscopy), 16 had readmission, and 3 had reoperation. 65 patients (42%) had two procedures with the majority having both readmissions and endoscopy (n = 59); and two patients (1%) had three procedures. Ulcer formation was most common in the intervention group (11.4%). The occurrence of ulcer formation was associated with unplanned ICU admissions (6.45%), transfusions (5.16%), postoperative UTI (3.87%), sepsis (1.94%), and myocardial infarction (0.65%). Death occurred in 76 patients with no related cases to MUs. The risk of ulcer was associated with increased BMI (OR 1.02, p = 0.01), presence of percutaneous transluminal cardiac catheterization (PTC) (2.17, p = 0.038), histories of DVT (1.72, p = 0.085), and pulmonary embolism (2.84, p = 0.002).
Conclusions: In a nationally reported database, symptomatic MUs rarely occur in the first month. The large majority are diagnosed and treated endoscopically with minimal need for surgical intervention. The risk of anastomotic ulcer was increased with increased BMI, need for PTC, and history of DVT/PE.
Keywords: Anastomotic ulcer; Gastric bypass; MBSAQIP database; Marginal ulcer.
Similar articles
-
Early Marginal Ulcer After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: MBSAQIP Database Analysis of Trends and Predictive Factors.Obes Surg. 2024 May;34(5):1536-1543. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07179-4. Epub 2024 Mar 19. Obes Surg. 2024. PMID: 38502517
-
Venous thromboembolism risk for the contemporary bariatric surgeon.Surg Endosc. 2020 Aug;34(8):3521-3526. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07134-w. Epub 2019 Sep 26. Surg Endosc. 2020. PMID: 31559578
-
Early marginal ulceration prevalence following primary RYGB: a rare events model of the MBSAQIP 2015-2021.Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2024 Oct;20(10):916-924. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2024.06.011. Epub 2024 Jul 7. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2024. PMID: 39060190
-
Marginal Ulcers Following One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Obes Surg. 2023 Sep;33(9):2884-2897. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06762-5. Epub 2023 Aug 1. Obes Surg. 2023. PMID: 37526816
-
Is antisecretory therapy after pancreatoduodenectomy necessary? Meta-analysis and contemporary practices of pancreatic surgeons.J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Apr;19(4):604-12. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2765-8. Epub 2015 Feb 18. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015. PMID: 25691111 Review.
Cited by
-
Identifying At-Risk Populations for Reoperations, Readmissions, and Interventions in MBSAQIP Using a Novel Inpatient Postoperative Care Metric.Obes Surg. 2025 Mar;35(3):915-925. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07686-y. Epub 2025 Jan 30. Obes Surg. 2025. PMID: 39883396
-
Marginal Ulcer Incidence and the Population of Gastrin Producing G cells Retained in the Gastric Pouch after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Is There a Relationship?Obes Surg. 2024 Apr;34(4):1152-1158. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07078-8. Epub 2024 Feb 14. Obes Surg. 2024. PMID: 38351199
-
The Choice of Gastric Bypass or Sleeve Gastrectomy for Patients Stratified by Diabetes Duration and Body Mass Index (BMI) level: Results from a National Registry and Meta-analysis.Obes Surg. 2021 Sep;31(9):3975-3989. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05459-x. Epub 2021 Jun 16. Obes Surg. 2021. PMID: 34132996
-
Early Marginal Ulcer After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: MBSAQIP Database Analysis of Trends and Predictive Factors.Obes Surg. 2024 May;34(5):1536-1543. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07179-4. Epub 2024 Mar 19. Obes Surg. 2024. PMID: 38502517
-
One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) as revisional procedures after failed laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG): systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Nov 18;408(1):440. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03175-x. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023. PMID: 37980292 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program. https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/mbsaqip/registry-request . Accessed 15 Mar 2018
-
- Peterli R, Wölnerhanssen BK, Peters T, Vetter D, Kröll D, Borbély Y, Schultes B, Beglinger C, Drewe J, Schiesser M, Nett P, Bueter M (2018) Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss in patients with morbid obesity: the SM-BOSS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 19:255–265 - DOI
-
- Weiss AC, Parina R, Horgan S, Talamini M, Chang DC, Sandler B (2016) Quality and safety in obesity surgery-15 years of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass outcomes from a longitudinal database. Surg Obes Relat Dis 1:33–40 - DOI
-
- Fringeli Y, Worreth M, Langer I (2015) Gastrojejunal anastomosis complications and their management after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. J Obes. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/698425 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials