Ectogenesis and a right to the death of the prenatal human being: A reply to Räsänen
- PMID: 30252944
- DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12512
Ectogenesis and a right to the death of the prenatal human being: A reply to Räsänen
Abstract
Both many critics of abortion and many defenders of abortion have suggested that artificial wombs could end the abortion debate. If the fetus is removed from the uterus, women have an end to an unwanted pregnancy. If the living fetus is then put in an artificial uterus for ectogenesis, there is no termination of the life of the fetus. Joona Räsänen challenges this view in his article, Ectogenesis, abortion and a right to the death of the fetus. Räsänen provides three arguments for a right to secure the death of the human being in utero, namely the 'right not to become a biological parent argument', the 'right to genetic privacy argument', and the 'right to property argument'. This article critiques these three arguments for a right to the death of the fetus.
Keywords: abortion; ectogenesis; genetic privacy; parenthood; property right; right not to become a parent.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Comment on
-
Ectogenesis, abortion and a right to the death of the fetus.Bioethics. 2017 Nov;31(9):697-702. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12404. Bioethics. 2017. PMID: 29044695
-
A dubious defense of 'after-birth abortion': A reply to Räsänen.Bioethics. 2018 Feb;32(2):132-137. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12413. Epub 2017 Nov 24. Bioethics. 2018. PMID: 29171674
-
Why pro-life arguments still are not convincing: A reply to my critics.Bioethics. 2018 Nov;32(9):628-633. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12502. Epub 2018 Aug 31. Bioethics. 2018. PMID: 30168863
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources