Helix free otoplasty for correction of prominent ear
- PMID: 30253889
- DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.08.005
Helix free otoplasty for correction of prominent ear
Abstract
Background: Prominent or bat ear is not uncommon deformity as it affecting 5% of population. Plenty of procedures were reported for its correction. Being plenty means it is still a subject of research. The current procedures could be summarized as cartilage sparing and cartilage splitting ones.
Methods: During a period of 35 months a total of 31 patients were presented with bilateral prominent ears so the included a total of 62 ears. Their average age was 8 years (ranging from five to 18 years). All deformities were corrected using helix free otoplasty technique which included skin paddle excision, separation of helical cartilage (hence the name helix free), anterior scoring, backward folding, mattress and simple suturing of the folded cartilage, proper definition of antitragus and earlobe and concha-mastoid sutures. Outcomes including patient's and/or guardians' satisfaction were determined.
Results: The postoperative period was uneventful except two cases that developed early postoperative hematomas, one case shows late postoperative antihelical fold irregularity in one ear and other case developed ill defined superior helix in one ear. The average follow up period of two years shows no recurrences. Almost all patients (96.85%) and their guardians were satisfied with the aesthetic results while only one (3.2%) was dissatisfied.
Conclusion: Helical free otoplasty technique addresses the deformity through a posterior approach with under vision correction. It has very low incidence of complications, high patient's satisfactions, no visible scars and no recurrences. It is a simple, short duration procedure, reliable and good option for correction of prominent ear.
Keywords: Helix free; Otoplasty; Prominent ear.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.
Similar articles
-
Otoplasty with an unusual cartilage scoring approach.J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2016;50(1):19-24. doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2015.1065265. Epub 2015 Jul 15. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2016. PMID: 26176319
-
Separating the helix from the antihelix: a new concept in prominent ear correction.Aesthet Surg J. 2010 Mar;30(2):139-53. doi: 10.1177/1090820X10369689. Aesthet Surg J. 2010. PMID: 20442089
-
Retrospective analysis of the Farrior technique for otoplasty.Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007 May-Jun;9(3):167-73. doi: 10.1001/archfaci.9.3.167. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007. PMID: 17519206
-
Otoplasty: evaluation, technique, and review.J Craniofac Surg. 2003 Sep;14(5):643-53. doi: 10.1097/00001665-200309000-00008. J Craniofac Surg. 2003. PMID: 14501322 Review.
-
Otoplasty: experience with a modification using a drill, and literature review.J Laryngol Otol. 2007 Jan;121(1):61-4. doi: 10.1017/S0022215106003689. Epub 2006 Nov 1. J Laryngol Otol. 2007. PMID: 17076930 Review.
Cited by
-
Benefits of Combined Surgical Techniques in Otoplasty.Eurasian J Med. 2022 Oct;54(3):281-284. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.22037. Eurasian J Med. 2022. PMID: 36135947 Free PMC article.
-
Minimally Invasive Technique for Correction of Prominent Ear.J Int Adv Otol. 2020 Aug;16(2):259-262. doi: 10.5152/iao.2020.7942. J Int Adv Otol. 2020. PMID: 32784166 Free PMC article.
-
Modified bilateral fasciaperichondrial flap for prominent ear correction.Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Jan-Feb;89(1):152-158. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2022.01.008. Epub 2022 Feb 15. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2023. PMID: 35279411 Free PMC article.
-
Complications of Cartilage Sparing Otoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Craniofac Surg. 2024 Feb 16;35(3):874-8. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009976. Online ahead of print. J Craniofac Surg. 2024. PMID: 38363310 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical