Survival Analysis of Cancer Patients of Differing Payer Type in South West Virginia, Between 2000 and 2013
- PMID: 30254811
- PMCID: PMC6150748
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.3022
Survival Analysis of Cancer Patients of Differing Payer Type in South West Virginia, Between 2000 and 2013
Abstract
Introduction The effect of insurance coverage on the health of at-risk populations is poorly understood in the Appalachian region of the United States. The goal of this study is to examine how different types of insurance coverage (Private Insurance, Medicare under 65, Medicare 65 or over, Medicaid and Self Pay) may influence cancer survival over time. This study analyzes colon, bladder, as well as combines anal, rectal, and esophageal cancers. Methods We systematically analyzed all West Virginia Cancer Registry patients between the years of 2000 and 2013 who was diagnosed with colon, bladder, anal, rectal, and esophageal cancers. Separate analysis examined colon (n = 927), bladder (n = 269), and combined anal, rectum, and esophageal cancers (n = 398). Cox proportional hazards models investigated the effect of insurance types on survival while controlling for age, sex, tobacco use, alcohol use, and cancer stage. Results Overall, tobacco use marginally significantly decreased colon cancer survival. Tobacco use had a suggestive relationship at hazards ratio at 1.150, 95% confidence interval: 0.9990-1.235, p = 0.052. The type of payer group did not alter survival. Older individuals tend to have a lower survival rate compared to those that are younger at the time of diagnosis. Also, late-stage cancer faced lower survival compared to those with early-stage cancer. Other results within stage groups corresponded to existing literature. Conclusion For the three differing cancer groupings, there was no significant survival difference for patients by insurance type. The effect of tobacco usage on colon cancer survival merits further research. The study design could be improved by considering more risk factors such as patient comorbidities that might affect patient care and survival.
Keywords: cancer; insurance; payer.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Association Between Primary Payer Status and Survival in Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer: An National Cancer Database Analysis.Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2019 Mar;18(1):e1-e7. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Sep 13. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2019. PMID: 30297265
-
The association of insurance and stage at diagnosis among patients aged 55 to 74 years in the national cancer database.Cancer J. 2010 Nov-Dec;16(6):614-21. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3181ff2aec. Cancer J. 2010. PMID: 21131794
-
Health care factors related to stage at diagnosis and survival among Medicare patients with colorectal cancer.Med Care. 2002 May;40(5):362-74. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200205000-00002. Med Care. 2002. PMID: 11961471
-
Effect of insurance type on perioperative outcomes after robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy for lung cancer.Surgery. 2019 Aug;166(2):211-217. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Jun 13. Surgery. 2019. PMID: 31202473
-
Association of insurance status with health outcomes following traumatic injury: statewide multicenter analysis.West J Emerg Med. 2015 May;16(3):408-13. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.1.23560. Epub 2015 Mar 17. West J Emerg Med. 2015. PMID: 25987915 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Health insurance and spending among cancer patients. Thorpe KE, Howard D. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=%22Health+insurance+and+spendi... Health Aff. 2003;W3:189–198. - PubMed
-
- Francis AM, Polissar L, Lorenz AB. Med Care. Vol. 22. Medical Care; 1984. Care of patients with colorectal cancer. A comparison of a health maintenance organization and fee-for-service practices; pp. 418–429. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources