Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul 22;10(7):e3022.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.3022.

Survival Analysis of Cancer Patients of Differing Payer Type in South West Virginia, Between 2000 and 2013

Affiliations

Survival Analysis of Cancer Patients of Differing Payer Type in South West Virginia, Between 2000 and 2013

Frank H Annie et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Introduction The effect of insurance coverage on the health of at-risk populations is poorly understood in the Appalachian region of the United States. The goal of this study is to examine how different types of insurance coverage (Private Insurance, Medicare under 65, Medicare 65 or over, Medicaid and Self Pay) may influence cancer survival over time. This study analyzes colon, bladder, as well as combines anal, rectal, and esophageal cancers. Methods We systematically analyzed all West Virginia Cancer Registry patients between the years of 2000 and 2013 who was diagnosed with colon, bladder, anal, rectal, and esophageal cancers. Separate analysis examined colon (n = 927), bladder (n = 269), and combined anal, rectum, and esophageal cancers (n = 398). Cox proportional hazards models investigated the effect of insurance types on survival while controlling for age, sex, tobacco use, alcohol use, and cancer stage. Results Overall, tobacco use marginally significantly decreased colon cancer survival. Tobacco use had a suggestive relationship at hazards ratio at 1.150, 95% confidence interval: 0.9990-1.235, p = 0.052. The type of payer group did not alter survival. Older individuals tend to have a lower survival rate compared to those that are younger at the time of diagnosis. Also, late-stage cancer faced lower survival compared to those with early-stage cancer. Other results within stage groups corresponded to existing literature. Conclusion For the three differing cancer groupings, there was no significant survival difference for patients by insurance type. The effect of tobacco usage on colon cancer survival merits further research. The study design could be improved by considering more risk factors such as patient comorbidities that might affect patient care and survival.

Keywords: cancer; insurance; payer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Colon cancer output.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Bladder cancer output.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Anal, rectal, and esophageal cancer output.

Similar articles

References

    1. Cancer drugs in the United States: Justum Pretium—The Just Price. Kantarjian HM, Fojo T, Mathisen M, Zwelling LA. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3600–3604. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Health insurance and spending among cancer patients. Thorpe KE, Howard D. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=%22Health+insurance+and+spendi... Health Aff. 2003;W3:189–198. - PubMed
    1. Rationing health care and the need for credible scarcity: why Americans can't say no. Mariner WK. Am J Public Health. 1995;85:1439–1445. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Francis AM, Polissar L, Lorenz AB. Med Care. Vol. 22. Medical Care; 1984. Care of patients with colorectal cancer. A comparison of a health maintenance organization and fee-for-service practices; pp. 418–429. - PubMed
    1. Geographic residency status and census tract socioeconomic status as determinants of colorectal cancer outcomes. Hines R, Markossian T, Johnson A, Dong F, Bayakly R. Am J Public Health. 2014;104:63–71. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources