Feasibility of reduced port surgery applying Higuchi's transverse incision
- PMID: 30254862
- PMCID: PMC6113963
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gmit.2016.05.003
Feasibility of reduced port surgery applying Higuchi's transverse incision
Abstract
Objective: Higuchi's transverse incision is made at a lower position than the Pfannenstiel transverse incision and is superior in terms of cosmetic outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine the safety and efficacy of novel forms of reduced port surgery for ovarian cysts and uterine fibroids applying Higuchi's transverse incision.
Methods: In 33 patients with ovarian cysts who underwent low-position single-incision laparoscopic surgery (L-SILS)-modified single-port laparoscopy placed in the 2-3-cm Higuchi's incision above the pubis, patient's characteristics and perioperative outcomes were compared with those of patients who underwent multiport laparoscopy (n = 53). In addition, 18 patients with uterine fibroids who underwent dual-port laparoscopically assisted myomectomy without using power morcellators and conventional four-port laparoscopically assisted myomectomy were investigated.
Results: There were no significant differences between L-SILS and multiport laparoscopy in tumor diameter, bleeding, hospital stay, or postoperative pain. However, the L-SILS group demonstrated significantly shorter operative and pneumoperitoneum times (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01). In comparison with cases of uterine fibroids, no significant differences were found in maximum fibroid diameter, operative time, pneumoperitoneum time, or bleeding. However, the dual-port laparoscopically assisted myomectomy group demonstrated a significantly shorter length of hospital stay than the conventional laparoscopically assisted myomectomy group (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: We reported novel forms of reduced port surgery applying Higuchi's transverse incision. It was suggested that these procedures are relatively simple, but ensure the same safety and efficacy as conventional methods. We intend to increase the number of cases and examine safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction for these procedures.
Keywords: laparoscopically assisted myomectomy; power morcellator; reduced port surgery.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.
Figures


References
-
- Medeiros LR, Rosa DD, Bozzetti MC, et al. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;2:CD004751. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004751 . - PubMed
-
- Behnia-Willison F, Foroughinia L, Sina M, McChesney P. Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) in gynaecology: feasibility and operative outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;52:366–370. - PubMed
-
- Park HS, Kim TJ, Song T, et al. Single-port access (SPA) laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: a surgeon's experience with an initial 200 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;154:81–84. - PubMed
-
- Fagotti A, Bottoni C, Vizzielli G, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for treatment of benign adnexal disease: single-center experience over 3-years. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012;19:695–700. - PubMed
-
- Ramirez PT. Single-port laparoscopic surgery: is a single incision the next frontier in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery? Gynecol Oncol. 2009;114:143–144. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources