Vaginal vault drainage after complicated single-port access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy
- PMID: 30254876
- PMCID: PMC6113973
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gmit.2016.04.005
Vaginal vault drainage after complicated single-port access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy
Abstract
Study objective: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of vaginal vault drainage after complicated singleport access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (SPA-LAVH).
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Ulsan University Hospital (tertiary teaching hospital), South Korea.
Patients: A total of 359 women underwent SPA-LAVH for the following conditions: benign uterine tumor, preinvasive uterine lesion, and microinvasive cervical cancer.
Interventions: The participants included 124 women with vault drains and 235 women without drains.
Measurements: Surgical outcomes, perioperative complications and morbidity, postoperative febrile morbidity.
Results: There were no differences in background features between drain and no-drain groups. In surgical outcomes, mean uterine weight (364.2 ± 184.9 g vs. 263.7 ± 138.6 g; p < 0.001), operation time (87.4 ± 21.5 min vs. 73.0 ± 17.6 min; p < 0.001), blood loss (225.3 ± 122.2 mL vs. 150.4 ± 95.2 mL; p < 0.001), and hemoglobin decline (1.97 ± 0.96 g/dL vs. 1.42 ± 0.89 g/dL; p < 0.001) were significantly larger for the drain group compared with the no-drain group. However, with regard to postoperative morbidity and complications, there were no group differences in the transfusion rates (6.5% vs. 3.8%; p = 0.300), intraoperative complications (2.4% vs. 1.3%; p = 0.420), perioperative complications (2.4% vs. 0.9%; p = 0.345), and febrile morbidity ≥ 37.5°C (8.9% vs. 11.5%; p = 0.477), although the drain group was more prone to the development of pelvic fluid collection and febrile morbidity than the no-drain group.
Conclusion: Vaginal vault drainage could be a safe alternative that allows for the management of postoperative morbidity and retains the advantages of minimally invasive surgery after complicated SPA-LAVH.
Keywords: febrile morbidity; hysterectomy; pelvic fluid collection; single-port access laparoscopy; vaginal vault drainage.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Interventions to reduce morbidity from vault hematoma following vaginal hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Jul;30(7):1061-1070. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3829-6. Epub 2018 Nov 29. Int Urogynecol J. 2019. PMID: 30498932
-
Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted versus single-port laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a case-matched study.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):624-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.01.005. Epub 2014 Jan 21. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 24462594
-
Efficiency of using a Foley catheter as a pelvic drain in vaginal hysterectomy.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Jul;226:21-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 May 23. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018. PMID: 29800900
-
Single-port vs. conventional multi-port access laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: comparison of surgical outcomes and complications.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Jul;169(2):366-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.03.026. Epub 2013 May 9. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013. PMID: 23664457
-
Efficiency of using a vaginal drain after hysterectomy: A systematic review.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Jun;237:175-180. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.04.020. Epub 2019 Apr 18. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019. PMID: 31063968
Cited by
-
Vaginal vault drainage as an effective and feasible alternative in laparoscopic hysterectomy.Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2022 Sep;65(5):477-482. doi: 10.5468/ogs.22083. Epub 2022 Jul 29. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2022. PMID: 35903944 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions to reduce morbidity from vault hematoma following vaginal hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Jul;30(7):1061-1070. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3829-6. Epub 2018 Nov 29. Int Urogynecol J. 2019. PMID: 30498932
References
-
- Hong MK, Wang JH, Chu TY, Ding DC. Laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy with Ligasure is better than conventional laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2014;3:78–81.
-
- Chen YJ, Wang PH, Ocampo EJ, Twu NF, Yen MS, Chao KC. Single-port compared with conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117:906–912. - PubMed
-
- Song T, Lee Y, Kim ML, et al. Single-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uterus. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2013;75:16–20. - PubMed
-
- Antonelli E, Morales MA, Dumps P, Boulvain M, Weil A. Sonographic detection of fluid collections and postoperative morbidity following Cesarean section and hysterectomy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23:388–392. - PubMed
-
- Thomson AJ, Sproston AR, Farquharson RG. Ultrasound detection of vault haematoma following vaginal hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105:211–215. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources