Vaginal vault drainage after complicated single-port access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy
- PMID: 30254876
- PMCID: PMC6113973
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gmit.2016.04.005
Vaginal vault drainage after complicated single-port access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy
Abstract
Study objective: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of vaginal vault drainage after complicated singleport access laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (SPA-LAVH).
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Ulsan University Hospital (tertiary teaching hospital), South Korea.
Patients: A total of 359 women underwent SPA-LAVH for the following conditions: benign uterine tumor, preinvasive uterine lesion, and microinvasive cervical cancer.
Interventions: The participants included 124 women with vault drains and 235 women without drains.
Measurements: Surgical outcomes, perioperative complications and morbidity, postoperative febrile morbidity.
Results: There were no differences in background features between drain and no-drain groups. In surgical outcomes, mean uterine weight (364.2 ± 184.9 g vs. 263.7 ± 138.6 g; p < 0.001), operation time (87.4 ± 21.5 min vs. 73.0 ± 17.6 min; p < 0.001), blood loss (225.3 ± 122.2 mL vs. 150.4 ± 95.2 mL; p < 0.001), and hemoglobin decline (1.97 ± 0.96 g/dL vs. 1.42 ± 0.89 g/dL; p < 0.001) were significantly larger for the drain group compared with the no-drain group. However, with regard to postoperative morbidity and complications, there were no group differences in the transfusion rates (6.5% vs. 3.8%; p = 0.300), intraoperative complications (2.4% vs. 1.3%; p = 0.420), perioperative complications (2.4% vs. 0.9%; p = 0.345), and febrile morbidity ≥ 37.5°C (8.9% vs. 11.5%; p = 0.477), although the drain group was more prone to the development of pelvic fluid collection and febrile morbidity than the no-drain group.
Conclusion: Vaginal vault drainage could be a safe alternative that allows for the management of postoperative morbidity and retains the advantages of minimally invasive surgery after complicated SPA-LAVH.
Keywords: febrile morbidity; hysterectomy; pelvic fluid collection; single-port access laparoscopy; vaginal vault drainage.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.
Figures
References
-
- Hong MK, Wang JH, Chu TY, Ding DC. Laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy with Ligasure is better than conventional laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2014;3:78–81.
-
- Chen YJ, Wang PH, Ocampo EJ, Twu NF, Yen MS, Chao KC. Single-port compared with conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117:906–912. - PubMed
-
- Song T, Lee Y, Kim ML, et al. Single-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uterus. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2013;75:16–20. - PubMed
-
- Antonelli E, Morales MA, Dumps P, Boulvain M, Weil A. Sonographic detection of fluid collections and postoperative morbidity following Cesarean section and hysterectomy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23:388–392. - PubMed
-
- Thomson AJ, Sproston AR, Farquharson RG. Ultrasound detection of vault haematoma following vaginal hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105:211–215. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources