Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2018 Apr-Jun;7(2):88-89.
doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_15_18. Epub 2018 May 2.

Hysteroscopy as a Tool for Identification of Uterine Endocervical Lesion

Affiliations
Case Reports

Hysteroscopy as a Tool for Identification of Uterine Endocervical Lesion

Maria Crizelda Valino et al. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2018 Apr-Jun.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Transvaginal ultrasound showing thickened endometrium and suspicious endocervical lesion (black arrow)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Hysteroscopy image showing papillary outgrowth at the endocervix (black arrow)

Similar articles

  • Hysteroscopy in the evaluation and treatment of mucinous adenocarcinoma.
    Williams AS, Kost ER, Hermann J, Zahn C. Williams AS, et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Mar;99(3):509-11. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01736-7. Obstet Gynecol. 2002. PMID: 11864683
  • Diagnostic hysteroscopy.
    Apgar BS, DeWitt D. Apgar BS, et al. Am Fam Physician. 1992 Nov;46(5 Suppl):19S-24S, 29S-32S, 35S-36S. Am Fam Physician. 1992. PMID: 1442472
  • Hysteroscopic endocervical resection.
    Wortman M, Daggett A. Wortman M, et al. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1996 Nov;4(1):63-8. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(96)80111-3. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1996. PMID: 9050714
  • Hysteroscopy.
    Valle RF. Valle RF. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jun;3(3):422-6. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1991. PMID: 1813009 Review.
  • Office hysteroscopy and adenomyosis.
    Molinas CR, Campo R. Molinas CR, et al. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Aug;20(4):557-67. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.01.019. Epub 2006 Mar 22. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006. PMID: 16554185 Review.

Cited by

References

    1. Morimura Y, Soeda S, Hashimoto T, Takano Y, Ohwada M, Yamada H, et al. The value of pre-operative diagnostic procedures for cervical involvement in uterine corpus carcinoma. Fukushima J Med Sci. 2000;46:1–1. - PubMed
    1. Cicinelli E, Marinaccio M, Barba B, Tinelli R, Colafiglio G, Pedote P, et al. Reliability of diagnostic fluid hysteroscopy in the assessment of cervical invasion by endometrial carcinoma: A comparative study with transvaginal sonography and MRI. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111:55–61. - PubMed
    1. Toki T, Oka K, Nakayama K, Oguchi O, Fujii S. A comparative study of pre-operative procedures to assess cervical invasion by endometrial carcinoma. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105:512–6. - PubMed
    1. Akbayir O, Corbacioglu A, Numanoglu C, Guleroglu FY, Ulker V, Akyol A, et al. Preoperative assessment of myometrial and cervical invasion in endometrial carcinoma by transvaginal ultrasound. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;122:600–3. - PubMed
    1. Nappi C, Di Spiezio Sardo A. State-of-the-art Hysteroscopic Approaches to Pathologies of the Genital Tract Ch. 6. Endo-Press. 2014:72–9.

Publication types