Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct;59(10):1061-1072.
doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12972.

Longitudinal structural brain development and externalizing behavior in adolescence

Affiliations

Longitudinal structural brain development and externalizing behavior in adolescence

Marieke G N Bos et al. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2018 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Cross-sectional studies report relations between externalizing behavior and structural abnormalities in cortical thickness of prefrontal regions and volume reductions in subcortical regions. To understand how these associations emerge and develop, longitudinal designs are pivotal.

Method: In the current longitudinal study, a community sample of children, adolescents and young adults (N = 271) underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in three biennial waves (680 scans). At each wave, aspects of externalizing behavior were assessed with parent-reported aggression and rule-breaking scores (Child Behavior Checklist), and self-reported aggression scores (Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire). Regions of interest (ROIs) were selected based on prior research: dorsolateral prefrontal (dlPFC), orbitofrontal (OFC), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), insula, and parahippocampal cortex, as well as subcortical regions. Linear mixed models were used to assess the longitudinal relation between externalizing behavior and structural brain development. Structural covariance analyses were employed to identify whether longitudinal relations between ROIs (maturational coupling) were associated with externalizing behavior.

Results: Linear mixed model analyses showed a negative relation between parent-reported aggression and right hippocampal volume. Moreover, this longitudinal relation was driven by change in hippocampal volume and not initial volume of hippocampus at time point 1. Exploratory analyses showed that stronger maturational coupling between prefrontal regions, the limbic system, and striatum was associated with both low and high externalizing behavior.

Conclusions: Together, these findings reinforce the hypothesis that altered structural brain development coincides with development of more externalizing behavior. These findings may guide future research on normative and deviant development of externalizing behavior.

Keywords: Externalizing behavior; adolescence; aggression; longitudinal design; structural MRI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Developmental trajectories of (A) parent‐reported aggression, (B), parent‐reported rule‐breaking, and (c) self‐reported aggression. The line represents the optimal fitting model, shade represents 95% confidence interval. Lines represent individual participants, and participants who were measured once are represented by dots. Note, circle is TP1, triangle is TP2 and square is TP3
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mixed model analyses for the longitudinal relation between parent‐reported aggression and hippocampal volume. Left panel represents individual data for three TPs for parent‐reported aggression and hippocampal volume. Right panel depicts predicted model for parent‐reported aggression and hippocampal volume (residuals). Note, circle is TP1, triangle is TP2 and square is TP3
Figure 3
Figure 3
Difference matrix for rates of anatomical change (High parent‐reported aggression group vs. low parent‐reported aggression group). Significant differences are depicted in the lower half of the matrix
Figure 4
Figure 4
Difference matrix for rates of anatomical change (High parent‐reported rule‐breaking group vs. low parent‐reported rule‐breaking group). Significant differences are depicted in the lower half of the matrix
Figure 5
Figure 5
Difference matrix for rates of anatomical change (High self‐reported aggression group vs low self‐reported aggression group). Significant differences are depicted in the lower half of the matrix

References

    1. Achenbach, T.M. , & Rescorla, L.A. (2000). ASEBA preschool forms & profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth and Families.
    1. Alexander‐Bloch, A. , Raznahan, A. , Bullmore, E. , & Giedd, J. (2013). The convergence of maturational change and structural covariance in human cortical networks. Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 2889–2899. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ameis, S.H. , Ducharme, S. , Albaugh, M.D. , Hudziak, J.J. , Botteron, K.N. , Lepage, C. , Keerthana, J. , & Karama, S. (2014). Cortical thickness, cortico‐amygdalar networks, and externalizing behaviors in healthy children. Biological Psychiatry, 75, 65–72. - PubMed
    1. Becht, A.I. , Bos, M.G.N. , Nelemans, S.A. , Peters, S. , Vollebergh, W.A.M. , Branje, S.J.T. , Keerthana, J. , & Crone, E.A. (2018). Goal‐directed correlates and neurobiological underpinnings of adolescent identity: A multimethod multisample longitudinal approach. Child Development, 89, 823–836. - PubMed
    1. Bos, M.G. , Peters, S. , van de Kamp, F.C. , Crone, E.A. , & Tamnes, C.K. (2018). Emerging depression in adolescence coincides with accelerated frontal cortical thinning. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59, 994–1002. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types