Does Spinal Cord Stimulation Really Influence Sleep?
- PMID: 30255537
- DOI: 10.1111/ner.12850
Does Spinal Cord Stimulation Really Influence Sleep?
Abstract
Background: To date, clinical pain research has typically used subjective questionnaires to assess effectiveness of treatment. However, in the near future, new technologies may provide us objective outcome measures as an alternative to self-report. The goal of this study is to compare subjective and objective sleep assessments in a population of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) patients, treated with spinal cord stimulation (SCS).
Methods: Twenty-two patients diagnosed with FBSS received SCS. Sleep data was collected at three time point: prior to SCS implantation (B), one month after SCS (T1), and two months after SCS (T2). Sleep data measured by actigraphy provided objective sleep data and were compared to Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) scores. Agreement between sleep parameters, total sleep time (TST), sleep efficiency (SE), and sleep onset latency (SOL), was examined.
Results: Nineteen out of 22 patients completed the study. We identified significant differences between objective and subjective measurements for TST and SE at baseline and after two months of SCS, with patients underestimating both parameters on the PSQI in comparison to objective measurements. For SOL no significant differences were found, although patients subjectively overestimated SOL at B.
Conclusion: The results about sleep measurements shown in this population of chronic pain patients, suggest that the subjective ratings scored worse than the objective measurements. Second, short-term SCS mainly seems to affect subjectively measured sleep parameters, especially SOL. This study shows the discrepancies between objective and subjective assessments in chronic pain research. Objective tools are indispensable for a correct assessment and treatment of sleep parameters. They are also playing a role as a biofeedback tool and are supporting the rehabilitation process.
Keywords: Actigraphy; Pittsburgh sleep quality index; chronic pain; failed back surgery syndrome; spinal cord stimulation.
© 2018 International Neuromodulation Society.
Similar articles
-
High-Dose Spinal Cord Stimulation for Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain and Leg Pain in Patients With FBSS, 12-Month Results: A Prospective Pilot Study.Neuromodulation. 2020 Jan;23(1):118-125. doi: 10.1111/ner.12940. Epub 2019 Mar 12. Neuromodulation. 2020. PMID: 30860645
-
Is the Self-Reporting of Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Patients Treated With Spinal Cord Stimulation in Line With Objective Measurements?Neuromodulation. 2018 Jan;21(1):93-100. doi: 10.1111/ner.12719. Epub 2017 Nov 3. Neuromodulation. 2018. PMID: 29105225
-
A prospective study evaluating sleep quality in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome patients treated by multicolumn spinal cord stimulation: study design protocol and presentation of the study population.Neurochirurgie. 2015 Mar;61 Suppl 1:S117-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Sep 22. Neurochirurgie. 2015. PMID: 25245920
-
Clinical Evidence for Spinal Cord Stimulation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS): Systematic Review.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Jul 15;42 Suppl 14:S61-S66. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002213. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017. PMID: 28441313
-
Treatment Options for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Patients With Refractory Chronic Pain: An Evidence Based Approach.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Jul 15;42 Suppl 14:S41-S52. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002217. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017. PMID: 28505029 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources