Effects of Education and Experience on Primary Care Providers' Perspectives of Obesity Treatments during a Pragmatic Trial
- PMID: 30257072
- PMCID: PMC6168402
- DOI: 10.1002/oby.22223
Effects of Education and Experience on Primary Care Providers' Perspectives of Obesity Treatments during a Pragmatic Trial
Abstract
Objective: To examine the impact of a 1-year pragmatic obesity trial on primary care providers' (PCPs) perspectives of treatment.
Methods: PCPs from four intervention clinics (PCP-I) and five control clinics (PCP-C) completed pre- and postintervention surveys on weight-loss counseling, comfort discussing obesity treatments, and perceived effectiveness of interventions; questions were rated on 0 to 10 Likert scales. Only PCP-I received patient updates and education about obesity management.
Results: Eighty PCPs completed preintervention surveys (pre: 71% female, 71% physicians); 82 PCPs completed postintervention surveys (post: 66% female, 70% physicians). PCPs were most comfortable discussing exercise before and after the trial (pre PCP-C: 8.22 [1.44], mean [standard deviation (SD)]; post PCP-C: 8.37 [1.24]; P = 0.8; pre/post PCP-I: 7.88 [1.51] vs. 7.80 [1.71]; P = 0.3). PCPs were initially least comfortable discussing phentermine/topiramate extended release (ER) but developed significantly more comfort after the trial, to a greater degree among PCP-I (pre/post PCP-C: 2.86 [2.66] vs. 3.73 [2.72], P < 0.001; pre/post PCP-I: 4.00 [2.57] vs. 6.17 [2.27], P < 0.001). After the trial, both PCPs rated exercise significantly less effective for weight loss, with a greater decrease in effectiveness rations among PCP-I (pre/post PCP-C: 7.73 [1.94] vs. 6.93 [2.35], P = 0.017; pre/post PCP-I: 6.27 [2.69] vs. 5.15 [2.31], P = 0.001). Both PCPs rated phentermine (pre/post PCP-C: 5.03 [2.05] vs. 5.50 [2.12], P = 0.002; pre/post PCP-I: 5.70 [1.64] vs. 6.83 [1.18], P = 0.001) and phentermine/topiramate ER (pre/post PCP-C: 3.91 [2.33] vs. 5.47 [2.54], P < 0.001; pre/post PCP-I: 5.58 [2.21] vs. 7.02 [1.47], P < 0.001) significantly more effective after the trial, though ratings were higher among PCP-I.
Conclusions: PCPs initially overvalued exercise and undervalued weight-loss medications. PCPs exposed to education and experience gave higher comfort and effectiveness ratings to weight-loss medications.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01922934.
© 2018 The Obesity Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Identifying Opportunities for Advancing Weight Management in Primary Care.J Prim Care Community Health. 2019 Jan-Dec;10:2150132719870879. doi: 10.1177/2150132719870879. J Prim Care Community Health. 2019. PMID: 31496342 Free PMC article.
-
Medical journey of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome and obesity: a cross-sectional survey of patients and primary care physicians.Postgrad Med. 2023 Apr;135(3):312-320. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2022.2140511. Epub 2022 Nov 12. Postgrad Med. 2023. PMID: 36330844
-
Primary care provider management of patients with obesity at an integrated health network: A survey of practices, views, and knowledge.Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Aug;14(8):1149-1154. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 Jun 5. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018. PMID: 29929858
-
Managing obesity in primary care practice: a narrative review.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013 Apr;1281(1):191-206. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12004. Epub 2013 Jan 16. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013. PMID: 23323827 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Nutrition care by primary-care physicians: advancing our understanding using the COM-B framework.Public Health Nutr. 2020 Jan;23(1):41-52. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019003148. Epub 2019 Nov 18. Public Health Nutr. 2020. PMID: 31736453 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Antiobesity Medication Use in 2.2 Million Adults Across Eight Large Health Care Organizations: 2009-2015.Obesity (Silver Spring). 2019 Dec;27(12):1975-1981. doi: 10.1002/oby.22581. Epub 2019 Oct 11. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2019. PMID: 31603630 Free PMC article.
-
The Joys and Challenges of Delivering Obesity Care: a Qualitative Study of US Primary Care Practices.J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Sep;36(9):2709-2716. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06548-w. Epub 2021 Feb 2. J Gen Intern Med. 2021. PMID: 33532954 Free PMC article.
-
Obesity Management Education Needs Among General Internists: A Survey.J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan-Dec;12:21501327211013292. doi: 10.1177/21501327211013292. J Prim Care Community Health. 2021. PMID: 33949233 Free PMC article.
-
Factors Associated With Semaglutide Initiation Among Adults With Obesity.JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2455222. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.55222. JAMA Netw Open. 2025. PMID: 39836425 Free PMC article.
-
We Should Do More to Offer Evidence-Based Treatment for an Important Modifiable Risk Factor for COVID-19: Obesity.J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan-Dec;12:2150132721996283. doi: 10.1177/2150132721996283. J Prim Care Community Health. 2021. PMID: 33648370 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Tanamas SK, Wong E, Backholer K, et al. Duration of obesity and incident hypertension in adults from the Framingham Heart Study. J Hypertens. 2015;33:542–545. discussion 545. - PubMed
-
- Finkelstein EA, Khavjou OA, Thompson H, et al. Obesity and severe obesity forecasts through 2030. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42:563–570. - PubMed
-
- Finkelstein EA, Trogdon JG, Cohen JW, Dietz W. Annual medical spending attributable to obesity: payer-and service-specific estimates. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28:w822–831. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical