Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2018 Sep 25;24(13):3582-3592.
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.079.

International Multisite Study of Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes for Drug Proarrhythmic Potential Assessment

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

International Multisite Study of Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes for Drug Proarrhythmic Potential Assessment

Ksenia Blinova et al. Cell Rep. .

Abstract

To assess the utility of human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) as an in vitro proarrhythmia model, we evaluated the concentration dependence and sources of variability of electrophysiologic responses to 28 drugs linked to low, intermediate, and high torsades de pointes (TdP) risk categories using two commercial cell lines and standardized protocols in a blinded multisite study using multielectrode array or voltage-sensing optical approaches. Logistical and ordinal linear regression models were constructed using drug responses as predictors and TdP risk categories as outcomes. Three of seven predictors (drug-induced arrhythmia-like events and prolongation of repolarization at either maximum tested or maximal clinical exposures) categorized drugs with reasonable accuracy (area under the curve values of receiver operator curves ∼0.8). hiPSC-CM line, test site, and platform had minimal influence on drug categorization. These results demonstrate the utility of hiPSC-CMs to detect drug-induced proarrhythmic effects as part of the evolving Comprehensive In Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay paradigm.

Keywords: CiPA; comprehensive in vitro proarrhythmia assay; drug-induced ventricular arrhythmia Torsade de Pointes; hiPSC-CM; human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomycotes; microelectrode array; voltage-sensitive dyes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

DECLARATION OF INTERESTS

The following co-authors are employed by or have declared interests in MEA or VSO platform manufacturer companies: G.S., Clyde Biosciences; D.M., Axion BioSystems; and X.Z., ACEA Biosciences. The following co-authors are employed by or have declared interests in stem cell manufacturer companies: T.K., Cellular Dynamics International; and R.K., Ncardia. G.G. is an employee of and a shareholder in the biopharmaceutical company AbbVie.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Representative Traces of Four Cellular Arrhythmia-Like Events Recorded in hiPSC-CMs
Recorded by (left) MEA and (right) VSO platforms. The horizontal scale bar equals 1 s. We refer to type A arrhythmia as a “mild” arrhythmia-like event in the text.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. EP Effects of Verapamil (Low TdP Risk) across 10 Sites (15 Site/Cell Combinations)
Panel titles represent site number followed by a three-letter code of EP platform used (AXN, Maestro [Axion BioSystems]; CLY, CellOPTIQ [Clyde Biosciences]; ECR, CardioECR [ACEA Biosciences]; AMD, AlphaMED64 [Alpha MED Scientific]; and MCS, MEA2100 [Multichannel Systems]). Druginduced repolarization prolongation (black and gray circles for Cor.4U and iCell2, correspondingly, left y axis) are shown as averaged baseline- and vehicle-controlled, Fridericia rate-corrected ddFPDc/ddAPD90c. Error bars represent SEs. The bars represent the percentage of wells in which a particular arrhythmic or quiescent event was observed (see color legend). ddFPDc/ APD90c was not calculated for the drug concentrations in which ≥50% of the wells included in the analysis were arrhythmic after drug addition. Drug concentrations (in μM and x-fold above free [unbound] clinical Cmax values) are shown in the table on the bottom of the figure, along with the concentration intervals. See also Data S1.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. EP Effects of Terfenadine (Intermediate TdP Risk) across 10 Sites (15 Site/Cell Combinations)
See Figure 2 legend. A star represents data with number of replicate wells N < 5.. See also Data S2
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Effects of Dofetilide (High TdP Risk) across 10 Sites (15 Site/Cell Combinations)
See Figure 2 legend. Stars represent missing data or data with number of replicate wells N ≤ 5. See also Data S3
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. Three Significant Model Predictors for Model 1 Shown for All 28 Drugs
Each data point represents individual dataset (site/ cell type combination, 15 datasets total). (A) Predictor 1, drug-induced arrhythmia-like event at any concentration (none, no arrhythmias; type A, only arrhythmia type A; other, any other arrhythmia type: B, C, D, or any combination of ≥2 arrhythmia types). (B) Predictor 4, maximum observed drug-induced repolarization prolongation or shortening (ddFPDc or ddAPD90c) at all studied drug concentrations. (C) Predictor 7, estimated drug-induced repolarization prolongation or shortening (ddFPDc or ddAPD90c) at clinical Cmax.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.. Model 1 (Dichotomous Model) Prediction of a Drug’s TdP Risk Category to Be Either Low or Intermediate and High Combined Averaged from All 10 Sites (15 Cell Type/Platform Combinations)
Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Red dotted line represents the 0.8 threshold discussed in the text.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.. Model 2 Prediction of a Drug to Fall into Low, Intermediate, or High TdP Risk Category Averaged across 10 Sites (15 Cell Type/Platform Combinations)
Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.

References

    1. Ando H, Yoshinaga T, Yamamoto W, Asakura K, Uda T, Taniguchi T, Ojima A, Shinkyo R, Kikuchi K, Osada T, et al. (2017). A new paradigm for drug-induced torsadogenic risk assessment using human iPS cell-derived cardiomyocytes. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 84, 111–127. - PubMed
    1. Asakura K, Hayashi S, Ojima A, Taniguchi T, Miyamoto N, Nakamori C, Nagasawa C, Kitamura T, Osada T, Honda Y, et al. (2015). Improvement of acquisition and analysis methods in multi-electrode array experiments with iPS cell-derived cardiomyocytes. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 75, 17–26. - PubMed
    1. Blinova K, Stohlman J, Vicente J, Chan D, Johannesen L, Hortigon-Vinagre MP, Zamora V, Smith G, Crumb WJ, Pang L, et al. (2017). Comprehensive translational assessment of human-induced pluripotent stem cell derived cardiomyocytes for evaluating drug-induced arrhythmias. Toxicol. Sci 155, 234–247. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clements M, and Thomas N (2014). High-throughput multi-parameter profiling of electrophysiological drug effects in human embryonic stem cell derived cardiomyocytes using multi-electrode arrays. Toxicol. Sci 140, 445–461. - PubMed
    1. Colatsky T, Fermini B, Gintant G, Pierson JB, Sager P, Sekino Y, Strauss DG, and Stockbridge N (2016). The Comprehensive in Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) initiative - update on progress. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 81, 15–20. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms