Automated versus Manual Data Extraction of the Padua Prediction Score for Venous Thromboembolism Risk in Hospitalized Older Adults
- PMID: 30257260
- PMCID: PMC6158031
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1670678
Automated versus Manual Data Extraction of the Padua Prediction Score for Venous Thromboembolism Risk in Hospitalized Older Adults
Abstract
Objective: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is an important consideration for hospitalized older adults, and the Padua Prediction Score (PPS) is a risk prediction tool used to prioritize patient selection. We developed an automated PPS (APPS) algorithm using electronic health record (EHR) data. This study examines the accuracy of APPS and its individual components versus manual data extraction.
Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized general internal medicine patients, aged 70 and over. Fourteen clinical variables were collected to determine their PPS; APPS used EHR data exports from health system databases, and a trained abstractor performed manual chart abstractions. We calculated sensitivity and specificity of the APPS, using manual PPS as the gold standard for classifying risk category (low vs. high). We also examined performance characteristics of the APPS for individual variables.
Results: PPS was calculated by both methods on 311 individuals. The mean PPS was 3.6 (standard deviation, 1.8) for manual abstraction and 2.8 (1.4) for APPS. In detecting patients at high risk for VTE, the sensitivity and specificity of the APPS algorithm were 46 and 94%, respectively. The sensitivity for APPS was poor (range: 6-34%) for detecting acute conditions (i.e., acute myocardial infarction), moderate (range: 52-74%) for chronic conditions (i.e., heart failure), and excellent (range: 94-98%) for conditions of obesity and restricted mobility. Specificity of the automated extraction method for each PPS variable was > 87%.
Conclusion: APPS as a stand-alone tool was suboptimal for classifying risk of VTE occurrence. The APPS accurately identified high risk patients (true positives), but lower scores were considered indeterminate.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Automating Venous Thromboembolism Risk Calculation Using Electronic Health Record Data upon Hospital Admission: The Automated Padua Prediction Score.J Hosp Med. 2017 Apr;12(4):231-237. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2714. J Hosp Med. 2017. PMID: 28411291
-
Risk-assessment and pharmacological prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with chronic liver disease.Thromb Res. 2014 Dec;134(6):1220-3. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2014.09.031. Epub 2014 Oct 2. Thromb Res. 2014. PMID: 25294587
-
Venous thromboembolism and the utility of the Padua Prediction Score in patients with sepsis admitted to internal medicine departments.J Thromb Haemost. 2013 Mar;11(3):467-73. doi: 10.1111/jth.12108. J Thromb Haemost. 2013. PMID: 23279085
-
Updated clinical models for VTE prediction in hospitalized medical patients.Thromb Res. 2018 Apr;164 Suppl 1:S62-S69. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2018.02.004. Thromb Res. 2018. PMID: 29703486 Review.
-
Derivation and External Validation of a Risk Assessment Model of Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Chinese Patients.Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023 Jan-Dec;29:10760296221151164. doi: 10.1177/10760296221151164. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023. PMID: 36650933 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A real-time prognostic model for venous thromboembolic events among hospitalized adults.Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2024 May 6;8(4):102433. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102433. eCollection 2024 May. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2024. PMID: 38882464 Free PMC article.
-
Automated Pulmonary Embolism Risk Assessment Using the Wells Criteria: Validation Study.JMIR Form Res. 2022 Feb 28;6(2):e32230. doi: 10.2196/32230. JMIR Form Res. 2022. PMID: 35225812 Free PMC article.
-
Utilization of the Caprini risk assessment model(RAM) to predict venous thromboembolism after primary hip and knee arthroplasty: an analysis of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project(HCUP).Thromb J. 2024 Jul 24;22(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12959-024-00633-4. Thromb J. 2024. PMID: 39049082 Free PMC article.
-
Provider Response to a Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment and Prophylaxis Ordering Tool: Observational Study.Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Oct;13(5):1214-1222. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1759770. Epub 2022 Dec 28. Appl Clin Inform. 2022. PMID: 36577502 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cohen A T, Agnelli G, Anderson F A et al.Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Europe. The number of VTE events and associated morbidity and mortality. Thromb Haemost. 2007;98(04):756–764. - PubMed
-
- Kahn S R, Hirsch A, Shrier I. Effect of postthrombotic syndrome on health-related quality of life after deep venous thrombosis. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(10):1144–1148. - PubMed
-
- Pengo V, Lensing A W, Prins M H et al.Incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(22):2257–2264. - PubMed
-
- Anderson F A, Jr, Zayaruzny M, Heit J A, Fidan D, Cohen A T. Estimated annual numbers of US acute-care hospital patients at risk for venous thromboembolism. Am J Hematol. 2007;82(09):777–782. - PubMed
-
- Cohen A T, Tapson V F, Bergmann J Fet al.Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE study): a multinational cross-sectional study Lancet 2008371(9610):387–394. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources