Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Sep 12:9:1323.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01323. eCollection 2018.

A New Zealand Perspective on the Application and Regulation of Gene Editing

Affiliations
Review

A New Zealand Perspective on the Application and Regulation of Gene Editing

Steffi Fritsche et al. Front Plant Sci. .

Abstract

New Zealand (NZ) is a small country with an export-led economy with above 90% of primary production exported. Plant-based primary commodities derived from the pastoral, horticultural and forestry sectors account for around half of the export earnings. Productivity is characterized by a history of innovation and the early adoption of advanced technologies. Gene editing has the potential to revolutionize breeding programmes, particularly in NZ. Here, perennials such as tree crops and forestry species are key components of the primary production value chain but are challenging for conventional breeding and only recently domesticated. Uncertainty over the global regulatory status of gene editing products is a barrier to invest in and apply editing techniques in plant breeding. NZs major trading partners including Europe, Asia and Australia are currently evaluating the regulatory status of these technologies and have not made definitive decisions. NZ is one of the few countries where the regulatory status of gene editing has been clarified. In 2014, the NZ Environmental Protection Authority ruled that plants produced via gene editing methods, where no foreign DNA remained in the edited plant, would not be regulated as GMOs. However, following a challenge in the High Court, this decision was overturned such that NZ currently controls all products of gene editing as GMOs. Here, we illustrate the potential benefits of integrating gene editing into plant breeding programmes using targets and traits with application in NZ. The regulatory process which led to gene editing's current GMO classification in NZ is described and the importance of globally harmonized regulations, particularly to small export-driven nations is discussed.

Keywords: New Zealand; gene editing; industry; regulation; traits.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Brooks A. K., Gaj T. (2018). Innovations in CRISPR technology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 52, 95–101. 10.1016/j.copbio.2018.03.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brooks C., Nekrasov V., Lippman Z. B., Van Eck J. (2014). Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated9 system. Plant Physiol. 166, 1292–1297. 10.1104/pp.114.247577 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bryan G., Roberts N. (2015). Superior Forages Could Result From GM Technology. Technical Series Online, 1–5.
    1. Butler N. M., Baltes N. J., Voytas D. F., Douches D. S. (2016). Geminivirus-mediated genome editing in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) using sequence-specific nucleases. Front. Plant Sci. 7:1045. 10.3389/fpls.2016.01045 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Callaway E. (2018). CRISPR plants now subject to tough GM laws in European Union. Nature 560:16. 10.1038/d41586-018-05814-6 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources