Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 12:5:218.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00218. eCollection 2018.

Looking on the Bright Side of Livestock Emotions-the Potential of Their Transmission to Promote Positive Welfare

Affiliations

Looking on the Bright Side of Livestock Emotions-the Potential of Their Transmission to Promote Positive Welfare

Luigi Baciadonna et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

Emotions can be defined as an individual's affective reaction to an external and/or internal event that, in turn, generates a simultaneous cascade of behavioral, physiological, and cognitive changes. Those changes that can be perceived by conspecifics have the potential to also affect other's emotional states, a process labeled as "emotional contagion." Especially in the case of gregarious species, such as livestock, emotional contagion can have an impact on the whole group by, for instance, improving group coordination and strengthening social bonds. We noticed that the current trend of research on emotions in livestock, i.e., investigating affective states as a tool to assess and improve animal welfare, appears to be unbalanced. A majority of studies focuses on the individual rather than the social component of emotions. In this paper, we highlight current limitations in the latter line of research and suggest a stronger emphasis on the mechanisms of how emotions in livestock are transmitted and shared, which could serve as a promising tool to synergistically enhance the welfare of all individuals within a group.

Keywords: affective states; emotional contagion; emotions; farm animals; wellbeing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mendl M, Burman OHP, Paul ES. An integrative and functional framework for the study of animal emotion and mood. Proc R Soc B (2010) 277:2895–904. 10.1098/rspb.2010.0303 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Paul ES, Harding EJ, Mendl M. Measuring emotional processes in animals: the utility of a cognitive approach. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. (2005) 29:469–91. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.01.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mendl M, Brooks J, Basse C, Burman O, Paul E, Blackwell E, et al. . Dogs showing separation-related behaviour exhibit a “pessimistic” cognitive bias. Curr Biol. (2010) 20:R839–40. 10.1016/j.cub.2010.08.030 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bradley MM. Emotion and motivation. Handb Psychophysiol. (2000) 2:602–42. 10.1017/CBO9780511546396.025 - DOI
    1. Kuppens P, Tuerlinckx F, Russell JA, Barrett LF. The relation between valence and arousal in subjective experience. Psychol Bull. (2013) 139:917–40. 10.1037/a0030811 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources