Hospital quality indicators are not unidimensional: A reanalysis of Lieberthal and Comer
- PMID: 30259508
- PMCID: PMC6407350
- DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13056
Hospital quality indicators are not unidimensional: A reanalysis of Lieberthal and Comer
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the dimensionality of hospital quality indicators treated as unidimensional in a prior publication.
Data source/study design: Pooled cross-sectional 2010-2011 Hospital Compare data (10/1/10 and 10/1/11 archives) and the 2012 American Hospital Association Annual Survey.
Data extraction: We used 71 indicators of structure, process, and outcomes of hospital care in a principal component analysis of Ridit scores to evaluate the dimensionality of the indicators. We conducted an exploratory factor analysis using only the indicators in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Hospital Value-Based Purchasing.
Principal findings: There were four underlying dimensions of hospital quality: patient experience, mortality, and two clinical process dimensions.
Conclusions: Hospital quality should be measured using a variety of indicators reflecting different dimensions of quality. Treating hospital quality as unidimensional leads to erroneous conclusions about the performance of different hospitals.
Keywords: Quality of care/patient safety (measurement); hospitals; patient experience.
© Health Research and Educational Trust.
Figures
References
-
- Institute of Medicine . Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; 2001.
-
- de Silva A, Valentine N. Measuring Responsiveness: Results of a Key Informants Survey in 35 Countries. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2000.
-
- Manary MP, Boulding W, Staelin R, Glickman SW. The patient experience and health outcomes. New Engl J Med. 2013;368(3):201–203. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
