Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct;7(10):4849-4862.
doi: 10.1002/cam4.1782. Epub 2018 Sep 27.

Circulating microRNA biomarkers for lung cancer detection in Western populations

Affiliations

Circulating microRNA biomarkers for lung cancer detection in Western populations

Haixin Yu et al. Cancer Med. 2018 Oct.

Abstract

Lung cancer (LC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death in the Western world. Patients with LC usually have poor prognosis due to the difficulties in detecting tumors at early stages. Multiple studies have shown that circulating miRNAs might be promising biomarkers for early detection of LC. We aimed to provide an overview of published studies on circulating miRNA markers for early detection of LC and to summarize their diagnostic performance in Western populations. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed and ISI Web of Knowledge to find relevant studies published up to 11 August 2017. Information on study design, population characteristics, miRNA markers, and diagnostic accuracy (including sensitivity, specificity, and AUC) were independently extracted by two reviewers. Overall, 17 studies evaluating 35 circulating miRNA markers and 19 miRNA panels in serum or plasma were included. The median sensitivity (range) and specificity (range) were, respectively, 78.4% (51.7%-100%) and 78.7% (42.9%-93.5%) for individual miRNAs, and 83.0% (64.0%-100%) and 84.9% (71.0%-100%) for miRNA panels. Most studies incorporated individual miRNA markers as panels (with 2-34 markers), with multiple miRNA-based panels generally outperforming individual markers. Two promising miRNA panels were discovered and verified in prospective cohorts. Of note, both studies exclusively applied miRNA ratios when building up panels. In conclusion, circulating miRNAs may bear potential for noninvasive LC screening, but large studies conducted in screening or longitudinal settings are needed to validate the promising results and optimize the marker panels.

Keywords: Western populations; early detection; lung cancer; miRNA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of the literature search process (up to 11th of August 2017)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Graphical representation of sensitivity vs specificity of analyzed miRNAs. Sensitivity is plotted on the y‐axis while on the x‐axis the false‐positive rate is presented (100‐Specificity). A, Overview of all analyzed miRNAs and miRNA panels; B, more detailed representation of miRNAs and miRNA panels with ≥80% sensitivity and ≥80% specificity. The numbers displayed in the brackets represent the corresponding reference numbers. Panel B (24 miRs): let‐7c, ‐122, ‐182, ‐193a‐5p, ‐200c, ‐203, ‐218, ‐155, let‐7b, ‐411, ‐450b‐5p, ‐485‐3p, ‐519a, ‐642, ‐517b, ‐520f, ‐206, ‐566, ‐661, ‐340*, ‐1243, ‐720, ‐543, ‐1267; Panel C: ‐214, ‐483‐5p, ‐193a‐3p, ‐25, ‐7; Panel D (24 miRs): ‐101, ‐106a, ‐126, ‐133a, ‐140‐3p, ‐140‐5p, ‐142‐3p, ‐145, ‐148a, ‐15b, ‐16, ‐17, ‐197, ‐19b, ‐21, ‐221, ‐28‐3p, ‐30b, ‐30c, ‐320, ‐451, ‐486‐5p, ‐660, ‐92a; Panel E (11 miRs): ‐155‐5p, ‐20a‐5p, ‐25‐3p, ‐296‐5p, ‐126‐3p, ‐223‐3p, ‐199a‐5p, ‐24‐3p, ‐152‐3p, ‐145‐5p, let‐7f‐5p; Panel G: ‐21, ‐486‐5p, ‐126, ‐210; Panel H (15 miRs): ‐92a, ‐30c, ‐30b, ‐28‐3p, ‐19b, ‐15b, ‐142‐3p, ‐140‐5p, ‐106a, ‐660, ‐451, ‐320, ‐221, ‐197, ‐17; Panel J (34 miRs): ‐92a, ‐486‐5p, ‐484, ‐191, ‐26a, let‐7b, ‐328, ‐30c, ‐342‐3p, ‐30b, ‐26b, ‐142‐3p, ‐331‐3p, ‐103, ‐17, ‐let‐7a, ‐126, ‐22, ‐374a, ‐148b, let‐7d, ‐28‐5p, ‐139‐5p, ‐376a, ‐98, ‐223, ‐142‐5p, ‐140‐5p, ‐29a, ‐148a, ‐133b, ‐32, ‐566, ‐432*. ADC, adenocarcinoma; LC, lung cancer; NSCLC, non‐small‐cell lung cancer; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet‐Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87‐108. - PubMed
    1. Field JK, Raji OY. The potential for using risk models in future lung cancer screening trials. F1000 Med Rep. 2010;2:38. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Manser R, Lethaby A, Irving LB, et al. Screening for lung cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(6):CD001991. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, et al. Team NLSTR: reduced lung‐cancer mortality with low‐dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:395‐409. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Croswell JM, Baker SG, Marcus PM, Clapp JD, Kramer BS. Cumulative incidence of false‐positive test results in lung cancer screening a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:505‐553. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources