Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May;45(3):182-187.
doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000555.

Refractive Error in Chinese Preschool Children: The Shanghai Study

Affiliations

Refractive Error in Chinese Preschool Children: The Shanghai Study

Tao Li et al. Eye Contact Lens. 2019 May.

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the prevalence of refractive error and some associated factors in Chinese preschool children.

Methods: The Jinshan District Eye Study was a school-based survey of eye health in a large sample of 4- to 6-year-olds attending kindergartens from May 2013 to December 2013 in Shanghai. Refractive error was measured using an autorefractor under noncycloplegic conditions. Axial length (AL) was measured with an ocular biometry system. In addition, body height and weight were also recorded.

Results: A total of 7,166 children successfully completed their refraction measurements. The median (interquartile range) of spherical equivalent (SE) for all the children was +0.25 D (-0.13 D to +0.62 D), and the range was -15.88 to +18.13 D. The mean AL for all the children was 22.35±0.70 mm, and the range was 18.20 to 27.71 mm. The overall prevalence of myopia (-1.00 D or less), hyperopia (+2.00 D or greater), and astigmatism (1.00 D or greater) were 5.9%, 1.0%, and 12.7%, respectively. After multivariate analysis, more myopic SE (or less hyperopic SE) was significantly associated with girls, longer AL, taller, and lighter.

Conclusion: Shanghai has a high prevalence of refractive error in the world. However, longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate refractive changes over time in individual children and warranted to prevent the development of myopia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Distributions of spherical equivalent by age. (A) 4 year-olds children; (B) 5 year-olds children; (C) 6 year-olds children. IQR, interquartile range.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Morgan IG, Ohno-Matsui K, Saw SM. Myopia. Lancet 2012;379:1739–1748. - PubMed
    1. Dolgin E. The myopia boom. Nature 2015;519:276–278. - PubMed
    1. Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, et al. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology 2016;123:1036–1042. - PubMed
    1. Rudnicka AR, Kapetanakis VV, Wathern AK, et al. Global variations and time trends in the prevalence of childhood myopia, a systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis: Implications for aetiology and early prevention. Br J Ophthalmol 2016;100:882–890. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wu JF, Bi HS, Wang SM, et al. Refractive error, visual acuity and causes of vision loss in children in Shandong, China. The Shandong Children Eye Study. PLoS One 2013;8:e82763. - PMC - PubMed