Telementoring for improving primary care provider knowledge and competence in managing chronic pain: A randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 30261805
- PMCID: PMC10802791
- DOI: 10.1177/1357633X18802978
Telementoring for improving primary care provider knowledge and competence in managing chronic pain: A randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Introduction: Primary care providers are frequently unprepared to manage chronic pain adequately due in part to insufficient professional training. This study evaluated the effect of a telementoring intervention on knowledge and perceived competence related to chronic pain management.
Methods: The study design was a cluster randomised controlled trial. Primary care clinics that were part of the University of Washington Medicine Telehealth network were the unit of randomization. Primary care providers comprised the intervention group (n = 23) and the control group (n = 18). Providers in the intervention group attended telementoring sessions through the TelePain programme and presented patient cases at the beginning and end of their enrolled patients’ 12-week study period. TelePain sessions included a didactic presentation and telementoring for specific patient cases by a panel of pain specialists from the disciplines of pain medicine, internal medicine, anaesthesiology, rehabilitation medicine, psychiatry, addiction medicine, nursing and complementary and integrative pain management. Providers’ baseline and end-of-study knowledge and perceived competence in managing chronic pain were assessed by three questionnaires: Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain, the KnowPain-12 and the Perceived Competence Scale.
Results: Knowledge (Z = –0.34, p = 0.97 (Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain) and Z = 0.49, p = 0.62 (KnowPain-12)) and perceived competence (Z = –0.74, p = 0.46) did not increase for providers in the intervention group compared with providers in the control group. These providers attended on average 12.5 sessions (range 0–31) while participating in the study.
Discussion: Further research is recommended to establish the effectiveness of this telementoring intervention.
Keywords: Teleconsulting; pain management; tele-education; telehealth; telementoring.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Effectiveness of Telementoring in Improving Provider Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceived Competence in Managing Chronic Pain: A Mixed Methods Study.Mil Med. 2023 May 16;188(5-6):1192-1198. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usac005. Mil Med. 2023. PMID: 35077533 Free PMC article.
-
Development and implementation of a telehealth-enhanced intervention for pain and symptom management.Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Jul;38(2):213-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.05.005. Epub 2014 May 17. Contemp Clin Trials. 2014. PMID: 24846620 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluation of an innovative tele-education intervention in chronic pain management for primary care clinicians practicing in underserved areas.J Telemed Telecare. 2019 Sep;25(8):484-492. doi: 10.1177/1357633X18782090. Epub 2018 Jul 10. J Telemed Telecare. 2019. PMID: 29991316
-
Healthcare providers' accuracy in assessing patients' pain: A systematic review.Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Oct;98(10):1197-206. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Jul 21. Patient Educ Couns. 2015. PMID: 26223850
-
Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(46):1-490. doi: 10.3310/hta24460. Health Technol Assess. 2020. PMID: 32975190 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Effectiveness of Telementoring in Improving Provider Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceived Competence in Managing Chronic Pain: A Mixed Methods Study.Mil Med. 2023 May 16;188(5-6):1192-1198. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usac005. Mil Med. 2023. PMID: 35077533 Free PMC article.
-
A survey of chronic pain telephone consultations during COVID-19 at an inner-city secondary care center.Pain Pract. 2021 Jul;21(6):731-732. doi: 10.1111/papr.13015. Epub 2021 Apr 30. Pain Pract. 2021. PMID: 33848052 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Usability and perceptions of a one-on-one telementoring program for young physicians in rural settings of Peru: a mixed method study.BMC Med Educ. 2023 Mar 22;23(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04142-2. BMC Med Educ. 2023. PMID: 36949455 Free PMC article.
-
A Qualitative Evaluation of the Pain Management VA-ECHO Program Using the RE-AIM Framework: The Participant's Perspective.Front Public Health. 2020 May 15;8:169. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00169. eCollection 2020. Front Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32500053 Free PMC article.
-
Implementation of the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes Model for Hypertension Education of Frontline Health Care Workers in the Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria: Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Evaluation.J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 24;27:e66351. doi: 10.2196/66351. J Med Internet Res. 2025. PMID: 40273438 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Phelan SM, Van Ryn M, Wall M, et al. Understanding primary care physicians’ treatment of chronic low back pain: The role of physician and practice factors. Pain Med 2009; 107: 1270–1279. - PubMed
-
- Breuer B, Cruciani R and Portenoy RK. Pain management by primary care physicians, pain physicians, chiropractors, and acupuncturists: A national survey. South Med J 2010; 1038: 738–747. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical