Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Nov;39(11):2064-2069.
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5804. Epub 2018 Sep 27.

Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms with Self-Expandable Braided Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms with Self-Expandable Braided Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

F Cagnazzo et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

Background: The safety and efficacy of treatment with self-expandable braided stents (LEO and LVIS) required further investigation.

Purpose: Our aim was to analyze the outcomes after treatment with braided stents.

Data sources: A systematic search of 3 databases was performed for studies published from 2006 to 2017.

Study selection: According to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we included studies reporting patients treated with LEO or LVIS stents.

Data analysis: Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool the following: aneurysm occlusion rate, complications, and neurologic outcomes.

Data synthesis: Thirty-five studies evaluating 1426 patients treated with braided stents were included in this meta-analysis. Successful stent delivery and complete aneurysm occlusion were 97% (1041/1095; 95% CI, 95%-98%) (I2 = 44%) and 88.3% (1097/1256; 95% CI, 85%-91%) (I2 = 72%), respectively. Overall, treatment-related complications were 7.4% (107/1317; 95% CI, 5%-9%) (I2 = 44%). Ischemic/thromboembolic events (48/1324 = 2.4%; 95% CI, 1.5%-3.4%) (I2 = 27%) and in-stent thrombosis (35/1324 = 1.5%; 95% CI, 0.6%-1.7%) (I2 = 0%) were the most common complications. Treatment-related morbidity was 1.5% (30/1324; 95% CI, 0.9%-2%) and was comparable between the LEO and LVIS groups. Complication rates between the anterior (29/322 = 8.8%; 95% CI, 3.4%-12%) (I2 = 41%) versus posterior circulation (10/84 = 10.5%; 95% CI, 4%-16%) (I2 = 0%) and distal (30/303 = 8%; 95% CI, 4.5%-12%) (I2 = 48%) versus proximal aneurysms (14/153 = 9%; 95% CI, 3%-13%) (I2 = 46%) were comparable (P > .05).

Limitations: Limitations were selection and publication biases.

Conclusions: In this analysis, treatment with the LEO and LVIS stents was relatively safe and effective. The most common complications were periprocedural thromboembolisms and in-stent thrombosis. The rate of complications was comparable among anterior and posterior circulation aneurysms, as well as for proximal and distally located lesions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Wanke I, Forsting M. Stents for intracranial wide-necked aneurysms: more than mechanical protection. Neuroradiology 2008;50:991–98 10.1007/s00234-008-0460-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. King B, Vaziri S, Singla A, et al. . Clinical and angiographic outcomes after stent-assisted coiling of cerebral aneurysms with Enterprise and Neuroform stents: a comparative analysis of the literature. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:905–09 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011457 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brinjikji W, Murad MH, Lanzino G, et al. . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2013;44:442–47 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.678151 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fiorella D, Arthur A, Boulos A, et al. . Final results of the US humanitarian device exemption study of the low-profile visualized intraluminal support (LVIS) device. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:894–97 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011937 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lubicz B, Kadou A, Morais R, et al. . Leo stent for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: very long-term results in 50 patients with 52 aneurysms and literature review. Neuroradiology 2017;59:271–76 10.1007/s00234-017-1805-3 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources